Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37434908›Full record

ArticleHCA healthcare journal of medicine2023

The Impact of Gender and Race When Using the GRACE ACS Score to Predict Mortality.

Ikechukwu Ogbu, Napatkamon Ayutyanont, Sarah Wilson, Hossein Akhondi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in HCA healthcare journal of medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Ikechukwu OgbuMountainView Hospital, Las Vegas, NV.
Napatkamon AyutyanontHCA Healthcare Graduate Medical Education, Brentwood, TN.
Sarah WilsonHCA Healthcare Graduate Medical Education, Brentwood, TN.
Hossein AkhondiUniversal Health Services, Las Vegas, NV.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Acute coronary syndrome (ACS) causes significant global morbidity and mortality and requires early risk stratification. The global registry of acute coronary events (GRACE) score is a well-known, validated risk stratification system that does not include race and gender. We aimed to assess whether the addition of gender and race could add to the predictability of the GRACE score model. Methods: We performed a retrospective cohort study of 46 764 ACS patients from the files of a national healthcare system. We compared the predictability of the GRACE score in conjunction with gender and race versus the original GRACE score. Different possible associations of predictability were investigated and statistically calculated. The accuracy of the prediction models was assessed using the receiver operating characteristic curve and its respective area under the curve (AUC). We compared the AUC of the 2 models, with the significance set at a Results: Our comparison favored the original GRACE score over the modified prediction model with gender and race added (AUC = 0.838 and 0.839 respectively, Conclusion: The GRACE score was valid in its original form and its ability to predict mortality was not substantially improved by including gender and race.

Indexed as

acute coronary syndromegender impactGlobal Registry of Acute Coronary EventsGRACE scorehealth status disparitiesheart diseaseshospital mortalityrace impact

Identifiers

PMID37434908
PMCPMC10332382

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.