ArticleAmerican journal of translational research2023
Public acceptability of lumbar puncture in the diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease: a questionnaire-based single center study in China.
Article in American journal of translational research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Lumbar Puncture Knowledge and Attitudes among Patients, Caregivers, and Healthcare Workers in Rural Zambia.The American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene · 2025Article
- Usefulness of lumbar puncture educational videos for older people with HIV.Frontiers in digital health · 2025Article
- Incremental value of amyloid PET in a tertiary memory clinic setting in China.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2024Article
- Evaluating the General Population of Saudi Arabia for Their Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practices Towards Dementia.Cureus · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimTo investigate public acceptability of lumbar puncture in the diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease and to find out the factors influencing patient decision.
methodsWe administered a questionnaire to participants who were native to Xi'an using the "Sojump" application. Participants were required to answer the questionnaire on their cell phones following the instructions. The questions of the questionnaire were divided into four categories, including demographic data, awareness of lumbar puncture, attitudes toward lumbar puncture for the diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease, and reasons for negative attitude. Logistic regression was used to analyze the factors influencing the attitude toward lumbar puncture testing.
resultsA total of 1050 valid questionnaires were collected, including 403 (38.4%) from non-medical personnel and 647 (61.6%) from medical personnel. Among them, 35.7% of the participants knew about lumbar puncture examinations. Regarding the attitude, 862 participants (82.1%) had a positive attitude toward lumbar puncture in the diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease, and 508 (58.9%) of them considered lumbar puncture to be helpful in confirming the diagnosis. Multivariate analysis revealed that factors associated with a positive attitude in the non-medical group included age (OR=0.963, P=0.003, 95% CI: 0.939-0.987), education level (OR=2.073, P=0.037, 95% CI: 1.044-4.114), monthly income (OR=1.340, P=0.031, 95% CI: 1.028-1.748), and type of occupation (OR=1.569, P=0.038, 95% CI: 1.026-2.400). Factors associated with a positive attitude in the medical group included place of residence (OR=9.182, P=0.036, 95% CI: 1.151-73.238), monthly income (OR=4.008, P=0.002, 95% CI: 1.689-9.511), and hospital level (OR=38.311, P < 0.001, 95% CI: 14.323-102.478).
conclusionsMore than 80% of the public has a positive attitude towards lumbar puncture in the diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease, suggesting high acceptability. However, the attitude toward lumbar puncture is depend on age, education level, economic status, and type of occupation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
37434808PMC10331662What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.