Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37434727›Full record

ArticleDigital health

Digital health for all: How digital health could reduce inequality and increase universal health coverage.

Steven van de Vijver, Paulien Tensen, Gershim Asiki, Ana Requena-Méndez, Michiel Heidenrijk, Karien Stronks, Frank Cobelens, Jettie Bont, Charles Agyemang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Digital health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 51 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
51citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

51 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Electronic Personal Health Records for Mobile Populations: A Rapid Systematic Literature Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2025
    Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. National Patterns of Remote Patient Monitoring Service Availability at US Hospitals.Circulation. Cardiovascular quality and outcomes · 2025
    Article
  20. Revisiting Ian McWhinney's principles in the digital health age.Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Steven van de VijverAmsterdam Health & Technology Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9174-7737
Paulien TensenAmsterdam Health & Technology Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Gershim AsikiAfrican Population and Health Research Center, Nairobi, Kenya.
Ana Requena-MéndezDepartment of Medicine Solna, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Michiel HeidenrijkAmsterdam Health & Technology Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Karien StronksDepartment of Public and Occupational Health, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Frank CobelensDepartment of Global Health, Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Jettie BontDepartment of Family Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Charles AgyemangDepartment of Public and Occupational Health, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Digital transformation in health care has a lot of opportunities to improve access and quality of care. However, in reality not all individuals and communities are benefiting equally from these innovations. People in vulnerable conditions, already in need of more care and support, are often not participating in digital health programs. Fortunately, numerous initiatives worldwide are committed to make digital health accessible to all citizens, stimulating the long-cherished global pursuit of universal health coverage. Unfortunately initiatives are not always familiar with each other and miss connection to jointly make a significant positive impact. To reach universal health coverage via digital health it is necessary to facilitate mutual knowledge exchange, both globally and locally, to link initiatives and apply academic knowledge into practice. This will support policymakers, health care providers and other stakeholders to ensure that digital innovations can increase access to care for everyone, leading towards

Indexed as

Digital dividehealth equityhealth policyhealth services accessibilityprimary health caretelemedicine

Identifiers

PMID37434727
PMCPMC10331232

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.