ArticleTranslational cancer research2023
Identification and evaluation of a risk model predicting the prognosis of breast cancer based on characteristic signatures.
Article in Translational cancer research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- Establishment and verification of a prognostic immune cell signature-based model for breast cancer overall survival.Translational cancer research · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Breast cancer (BC) is one of the most common fatal cancers in women. Identifying new biomarkers is thus of great significance for the diagnosis and prognosis of BC. Methods: In this study, 1,030 BC cases from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) were obtained for differential expression analysis and Short Time-series Expression Miner (STEM) analysis to identify characteristic BC development genes, which were further divided into upregulated and downregulated genes. Two predictive prognosis models were both defined by Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator (LASSO). Survival analysis and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis were used to determine the diagnostic and prognostic capabilities of the two gene set model scores, respectively. Results: Our findings from this study suggested that both the unfavorable (BC1) and favorable (BC2) gene sets are reliable biomarkers for the diagnosis and prognosis of BC, although the BC1 model presents better diagnostic and prognostic value. Associations between the models and M2 macrophages and sensitivity to Bortezomib were also found, indicating that unfavorable BC genes are significantly involved in the tumor immune microenvironment. Conclusions: We successfully established one predictive prognosis model (BC1) based on characteristic gene sets of BC to diagnose and predict the survival time of BC patients using a cluster of 12 differentially expressed genes (DEGs).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.