Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37434687›Full record

ArticleTranslational cancer research2023

Identification and evaluation of a risk model predicting the prognosis of breast cancer based on characteristic signatures.

Yu Ying, Meifeng Yang, Jiaying Chen, Chang Yao, Weihe Bian, Cong Wang, Bei Ye, Tong Shen, Mengmeng Guo, Xiping Zhang and 2 more

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Translational cancer research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Yu Ying *Department of Breast Surgery, Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine, Jiangsu Province Hospital of Chinese Medicine, Nanjing, China.
Meifeng Yang *Department of Rehabilitation, Children's Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China.
Jiaying Chen *The First Clinical School, Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine, Nanjing, China.
Chang YaoDepartment of Breast Surgery, Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine, Jiangsu Province Hospital of Chinese Medicine, Nanjing, China.
Weihe BianDepartment of Breast Surgery, Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine, Jiangsu Province Hospital of Chinese Medicine, Nanjing, China.
Cong WangDepartment of Breast Surgery, Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine, Jiangsu Province Hospital of Chinese Medicine, Nanjing, China.
Bei YeDepartment of Breast Surgery, Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine, Jiangsu Province Hospital of Chinese Medicine, Nanjing, China.
Tong ShenDepartment of General Surgery, Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine, Jiangsu Province Hospital of Chinese Medicine, Nanjing, China.
Mengmeng GuoDepartment of Breast Surgery, Nantong Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Nantong, China.
Xiping ZhangThe First Clinical School, Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine, Nanjing, China.
Sihan CaoThe First Clinical School, Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine, Nanjing, China.
Chaoqun MaDepartment of General Surgery, Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine, Jiangsu Province Hospital of Chinese Medicine, Nanjing, China.
Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine · CNJiangsu Province Hospital · CNAnyang Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine · CNSecond Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Breast cancer (BC) is one of the most common fatal cancers in women. Identifying new biomarkers is thus of great significance for the diagnosis and prognosis of BC. Methods: In this study, 1,030 BC cases from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) were obtained for differential expression analysis and Short Time-series Expression Miner (STEM) analysis to identify characteristic BC development genes, which were further divided into upregulated and downregulated genes. Two predictive prognosis models were both defined by Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator (LASSO). Survival analysis and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis were used to determine the diagnostic and prognostic capabilities of the two gene set model scores, respectively. Results: Our findings from this study suggested that both the unfavorable (BC1) and favorable (BC2) gene sets are reliable biomarkers for the diagnosis and prognosis of BC, although the BC1 model presents better diagnostic and prognostic value. Associations between the models and M2 macrophages and sensitivity to Bortezomib were also found, indicating that unfavorable BC genes are significantly involved in the tumor immune microenvironment. Conclusions: We successfully established one predictive prognosis model (BC1) based on characteristic gene sets of BC to diagnose and predict the survival time of BC patients using a cluster of 12 differentially expressed genes (DEGs).

Indexed as

Breast cancer (BC)characteristic gene setpredictionprognosisrisk models

Identifiers

PMID37434687
PMCPMC10331456
OpenAlexW4382399444

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.