ReviewJournal of medical radiation sciences2023
Evaluating the use of intraoperative magnetic resonance imaging in paediatric brain tumour resection surgeries: a literature review.
Review in Journal of medical radiation sciences, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- The emerging role of intraoperative nanopore sequencing on the neurosurgical strategy in paediatric embryonal brain tumours.Child's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery · 2026Review
- End-of-surgery MRI following pediatric neuro-oncological tumor resection.Child's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery · 2026Observational
- Delineating precise surgical resection areas: recent advances in NIR-II fluorescence imaging molecular probes.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Review
- Observations from the first 100 cases of intraoperative MRI - experiences, trends and short-term outcomes.BMC surgery · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Brain tumours are the most common solid neoplasm in children, posing a significant challenge in oncology due to the limited range of treatment. Intraoperative magnetic resonance imaging (iMRI) has recently emerged to aid surgical intervention in neurosurgery resection with the potential to delineate tumour boundaries. This narrative literature review aimed to provide an updated evaluation of the clinical implementation of iMRI in paediatric neurosurgical resection, with an emphasis on the extent of brain tumour resection, patient outcomes and its drawbacks. Databases including MEDLINE, PubMed, Scopus and Web of Science were used to investigate this topic with key terms: paediatric, brain tumour, and iMRI. Exclusion criteria included literature comprised of adult populations and the use of iMRI in neurosurgery in the absence of brain tumours. The limited body of research evaluating the clinical implementation of iMRI in paediatric cohorts has been predominantly positive. Current evidence demonstrates the potential for iMRI use to increase rates of gross total resection (GTR), assess the extent of resection, and improve patient outcomes, such as progression-free survival. Limitations regarding the use of iMRI include prolonged operation times and complications associated with head immobilisation devices. iMRI has the potential to aid in the achievement of maximal brain tumour resection in paediatric patients. Future prospective randomised controlled trials are necessary to determine the clinical significance and benefits of using iMRI during neurosurgical resection for clinical management of brain neoplasms in children.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.