ArticleProceedings. Biological sciences2023
Evidence of artefacts made of giant sloth bones in central Brazil around the last glacial maximum.
Article in Proceedings. Biological sciences, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.
- For your eyes too: a new set of images of biological materials from the scientific commissioning of the MOGNO beamline at Sirius.Journal of synchrotron radiation · 2026Article
- Peptide Mass Fingerprinting of South American Xenarthrans: A New Resource for Zooarcheology and Palaeontology.Journal of proteome research · 2025Article
- Climate influence on the early human occupation of South America during the late Pleistocene.Nature communications · 2025Article
- Human dietary diversity in the Colombian Andes at the terminal Pleistocene-late Holocene sites Tequendama and Aguazuque.iScience · 2025Article
- Prioritizing Conservation Areas for the Hyacinth Macaw (Evolutionary applications · 2024Article
- A reference genome for the Harpy Eagle reveals steady demographic decline and chromosomal rearrangements in the origin of Accipitriformes.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Anthropogenic modification of a giant ground sloth tooth from Brazil supported by a multi-disciplinary approach.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Comment on Boyde et al. (2023), 'Fleas and lesions in armadillo osteoderms'.Journal of anatomy · 2024Article
- The latest freshwater giants: a newBiology letters · 2024Article
- Use of hare bone for the manufacture of a Clovis bead.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Anthropic cut marks in extinct megafauna bones from the Pampean region (Argentina) at the last glacial maximum.PloS one · 2024Article
- Taguatagua 3: A new late Pleistocene settlement in a highly suitable lacustrine habitat in central Chile (34°S).PloS one · 2024Article
- Evidence of artefacts made of giant sloth bones in central Brazil around the last glacial maximum.Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors at 9 institutions in 4 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The peopling of the Americas and human interaction with the Pleistocene megafauna in South America remain hotly debated. The Santa Elina rock shelter in Central Brazil shows evidence of successive human settlements from around the last glacial maximum (LGM) to the Early Holocene. Two Pleistocene archaeological layers include rich lithic industry associated with remains of the extinct giant ground sloth
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.