ArticleCancer medicine2023
Value of the application of computed tomography-based radiomics for preoperative prediction of unfavorable pathology in initial bladder cancer.
Article in Cancer medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- CT image-derived radiomics predicts molecular subtypes in bladder urothelial carcinoma: validation of a non-invasive classification strategy.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Radiomics and deep learning in upper tract urothelial carcinoma: advancing preoperative risk stratification and clinical decision-making.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Review
- Development and validation of a radiomics-based nomogram for predicting pathological grade of upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma.BMC cancer · 2024Article
- Value of the application of computed tomography-based radiomics for preoperative prediction of unfavorable pathology in initial bladder cancer.Cancer medicine · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesTo construct and validate unfavorable pathology (UFP) prediction models for patients with the first diagnosis of bladder cancer (initial BLCA) and to compare the comprehensive predictive performance of these models. MATERIALS AND
methodsA total of 105 patients with initial BLCA were included and randomly enrolled into the training and testing cohorts in a 7:3 ratio. The clinical model was constructed using independent UFP-risk factors determined by multivariate logistic regression (LR) analysis in the training cohort. Radiomics features were extracted from manually segmented regions of interest in computed tomography (CT) images. The optimal CT-based radiomics features to predict UFP were determined by the optimal feature filter and the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator algorithm. The radiomics model consist with the optimal features was constructed by the best of the six machine learning filters. The clinic-radiomics model combined the clinical and radiomics models via LR. The area under the curve (AUC), accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive value, calibration curve and decision curve analysis were used to evaluate the predictive performance of the models.
resultsPatients in the UFP group had a significantly older age (69.61 vs. 63.93 years, p = 0.034), lager tumor size (45.7% vs. 11.1%, p = 0.002) and higher neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR; 2.76 vs. 2.33, p = 0.017) than favorable pathologic group in the training cohort. Tumor size (OR, 6.02; 95% CI, 1.50-24.10; p = 0.011) and NLR (OR, 1.50; 95% CI, 1.05-2.16; p = 0.026) were identified as independent predictive factors for UFP, and the clinical model was constructed using these factors. The LR classifier with the best AUC (0.817, the testing cohorts) was used to construct the radiomics model based on the optimal radiomics features. Finally, the clinic-radiomics model was developed by combining the clinical and radiomics models using LR. After comparison, the clinic-radiomics model had the best performance in comprehensive predictive efficacy (accuracy = 0.750, AUC = 0.817, the testing cohorts) and clinical net benefit among UFP-prediction models, while the clinical model (accuracy = 0.625, AUC = 0.742, the testing cohorts) was the worst.
conclusionOur study demonstrates that the clinic-radiomics model exhibits the best predictive efficacy and clinical net benefit for predicting UFP in initial BLCA compared with the clinical and radiomics model. The integration of radiomics features significantly improves the comprehensive performance of the clinical model.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.