Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37434230›Full record

ArticleGlobal health research and policy2023

Prevalence and trends of polypharmacy in U.S. adults, 1999-2018.

Xiaowen Wang, Keyang Liu, Kokoro Shirai, Chengyao Tang, Yonghua Hu, Ying Wang, Yuantao Hao, Jia-Yi Dong

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Global health research and policy, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 63 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
63citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
17.5field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

63 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 98 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review

3 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Xiaowen WangCenter for Public Health and Epidemic Preparedness and Response, Peking University, Beijing, 100191, China.
Keyang LiuPublic Health, Department of Social Medicine, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, 5650871, Japan.
Kokoro ShiraiPublic Health, Department of Social Medicine, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, 5650871, Japan.
Chengyao TangPublic Health, Department of Social Medicine, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, 5650871, Japan.
Yonghua HuDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Peking University Health Science Center, Beijing, 100191, China.
Ying WangDepartment of Medical Statistics, School of Public Health, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, 510080, China.
Yuantao HaoCenter for Public Health and Epidemic Preparedness and Response, Peking University, Beijing, 100191, China. haoyt@bjmu.edu.cn.
Jia-Yi DongPublic Health, Department of Social Medicine, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, 5650871, Japan. dongjy@mail3.sysu.edu.cn.ORCID 0000-0002-8667-6946
Peking University · CNThe University of Osaka · JPOsaka Health Science University · JPSun Yat-sen University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPolypharmacy is one of the most important health issues for its potential impacts on disease burden and healthcare costs. The aim of this study was to update a comprehensive picture of prevalence and trends in polypharmacy over 20 years in U.S. adults.

methodsParticipants included 55,081 adults aged ≥ 20 from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, January 1, 1999, through December 31, 2018. The simultaneously use of ≥ 5 drugs in one individual was defined as polypharmacy. National prevalence and trends in polypharmacy were evaluated among U.S. adults within different demo-socioeconomic status and pre-existing diseases.

resultsFrom 1999-2000 to 2017-2018, the overall percentages of adults with polypharmacy remained on the rise, increasing from 8.2% (7.2-9.2%) to 17.1% (15.7-18.5%) (average annual percentage change [AAPC] = 2.9%, P = .001). The polypharmacy prevalence was considerably higher in the elderly (from 23.5% to 44.1%), in adults with heart disease (from 40.6% to 61.7%), and in adults with diabetes (from 36.3% to 57.7%). Also, we observed a greater increase rate of polypharmacy in men (AAPC = 4.1%, P < .001), in the Mexican American (AAPC = 6.3%, P < .001), and in the non-Hispanic Black (AAPC = 4.4%, P < .001).

conclusionsFrom 1999-2000 to 2017-2018, the prevalence of polypharmacy is continually increasing in U.S. adults. The polypharmacy was especially higher in the older, in patients with heart disease, or diabetes. The high prevalence urges the healthcare providers and health policymakers to manage polypharmacy among specific population groups.

Indexed as

PolypharmacyAdultDiabetes MellitusHeart DiseasesHumansNutrition SurveysPrevalenceUnited StatesMedicationNational Health and Nutrition Examination SurveyNHANESPolypharmacyPrevalenceTrends

Identifiers

PMID37434230
PMCPMC10337167
OpenAlexW4383896890

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.