Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37434210›Full record

ReviewResearch involvement and engagement2023

Participatory development of a framework to actively involve people living with dementia and those from their social network, and healthcare professionals in conducting a systematic review: the DECIDE-SR protocol.

Mike Rommerskirch-Manietta, Christina Manietta, Anna Louisa Hoffmann, Helga Rohra, Dianne Gove, Birgit Alpers, Lillian Hung, Carol R Geary, Katherine M Abbott, Lily Haopu Ren and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Research involvement and engagement, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 7 institutions in 4 countries.

Mike Rommerskirch-Manietta *Deutsches Zentrum für Neurodegenerative Erkrankungen (DZNE), Site Witten, Witten, Germany. Mike.Rommerskirch-Manietta@dzne.de.
Christina Manietta *Deutsches Zentrum für Neurodegenerative Erkrankungen (DZNE), Site Witten, Witten, Germany.
Anna Louisa HoffmannDeutsches Zentrum für Neurodegenerative Erkrankungen (DZNE), Site Witten, Witten, Germany.
Helga RohraDeutsches Zentrum für Neurodegenerative Erkrankungen (DZNE), Patient Advisory Board, Bonn, Germany.
Dianne GoveAlzheimer Europe, Luxembourg, Luxembourg.
Birgit AlpersMedical Center Hamburg Eppendorf (UKE), Hamburg, Germany.
Lillian HungSchool of Nursing, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.
Carol R GearyCollege of Medicine, University of Nebraska, Omaha, USA.
Katherine M AbbottDepartment of Sociology and Gerontology, Miami University, Oxford, USA.
Lily Haopu RenSchool of Nursing, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.
Stefanie OberfeldDepartment of Geriatric Psychiatry, St. Rochus-Hospital, Telgte, Germany.
Ana DiazAlzheimer Europe, Luxembourg, Luxembourg.
Martina RoesDeutsches Zentrum für Neurodegenerative Erkrankungen (DZNE), Site Witten, Witten, Germany.
German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases · DEAlzheimer Europe · LUUniversity of British Columbia · CAWitten/Herdecke University · DEMiami University · USUniversität Hamburg · DEUniversity of Nebraska at Omaha · US

Funding

Federal Ministry of Education and Research in Germany (BMBF) 01KG2213
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSystematic reviews summarize and evaluate relevant studies to contribute to evidence-based practice. Internationally, researchers have reached a consensus that the active involvement of the public leads to better research. Despite this agreement, there are many reviews of research concerning healthcare interventions intended to promote the care of people living with dementia and those from their social network (e.g., close contacts, both family and non-family members) primarily involve only healthcare professionals and other experts. Due to the lack of a dementia-sensitive framework to actively involve people living with dementia and those from their social network, and healthcare professionals as co-researchers in systematic reviews, it is important to develop a framework to inform practice.

methodsFor this framework development process, we will recruit four people living with dementia and a total of four people from their social network, and three healthcare professionals working in acute or long-term care settings. We will conduct regular meetings with these groups of the public and healthcare professionals to include them in all stages of the systematic review. We will also identify and develop methods necessary to ensure meaningful involvement. The results will be documented and analyzed for the development of a framework. For the planning and preparation for these meetings, as well as the conduct of the meetings themselves, we will be guided by the principles of the INVOLVE approach. In addition, the ACTIVE framework will be used to guide the degree of involvement and the stage in the review process. DISCUSSION: We assume that our transparent approach to the development of a framework to support the active involvement of people living with dementia and those from their social network, and healthcare professionals in systematic reviews will serve as an impetus for and provide guidance to other researchers with the goal of increasing researchers' focus on this topic and facilitating systematic reviews that apply participatory approaches.

trial registrationTrial registration is unnecessary as no intervention study will be conducted.

Indexed as

CollaborationDementiaFrameworkParticipatory researchPublic

Identifiers

PMID37434210
PMCPMC10337195
OpenAlexW4383888050

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.