Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37434187›Full record

SynthesisInternational journal for equity in health2023

Targeted health and social care interventions for women and infants who are disproportionately impacted by health inequalities in high-income countries: a systematic review.

Zahra Khan, Zoe Vowles, Cristina Fernandez Turienzo, Zenab Barry, Lia Brigante, Soo Downe, Abigail Easter, Seeromanie Harding, Alison McFadden, Elsa Montgomery and 7 more

Open access · goldAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in International journal for equity in health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
13.5field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 49 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Interventions to Address Disparities in Perinatal Outcomes by Ethnicity: A Systematic Review.BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology · 2025
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Trial
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Zahra KhanDepartment of Women & Children's Health, King's College London, London, UK. zahra.khan@kcl.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0002-5700-4956
Zoe VowlesDepartment of Women & Children's Health, King's College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-6989-2180
Cristina Fernandez TurienzoDepartment of Women & Children's Health, King's College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-7393-6593
Zenab BarryPatient and Public Involvement and Engagement, NIHR ARC South London, London, UK.
Lia BriganteRoyal College of Midwives, London, UK.
Soo DowneUniversity of Central Lancashire, Lancashire, UK.
Abigail EasterDepartment of Women & Children's Health, King's College London, London, UK.
Seeromanie HardingDepartment of Population Health Sciences, King's College London, London, UK.
Alison McFaddenSchool of Health Sciences, University of Dundee, Dundee, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-5164-2025
Elsa MontgomeryMethodologies Division, King's College London, London, UK.
Lesley PageKing's College London, London, UK.
Hannah Rayment-JonesDepartment of Women & Children's Health, King's College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-3027-8025
Mary RenfrewUniversity of Dundee, Dundee, UK.
Sergio A SilverioDepartment of Women & Children's Health, King's College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-7177-3471
Helen SpibyUniversity of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.
Nazmy Villarroel-WilliamsSheffield Hallam University, Sheffield, UK.
Jane SandallDepartment of Women & Children's Health, King's College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-2000-743X
King's College London · GBUniversity of Dundee · GBRoyal College of Midwives · GBSheffield Hallam University · GBUniversity of Lancashire · GBUniversity of Nottingham · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDisadvantaged populations (such as women from minority ethnic groups and those with social complexity) are at an increased risk of poor outcomes and experiences. Inequalities in health outcomes include preterm birth, maternal and perinatal morbidity and mortality, and poor-quality care. The impact of interventions is unclear for this population, in high-income countries (HIC). The review aimed to identify and evaluate the current evidence related to targeted health and social care service interventions in HICs which can improve health inequalities experienced by childbearing women and infants at disproportionate risk of poor outcomes and experiences.

methodsTwelve databases searched for studies across all HICs, from any methodological design. The search concluded on 8/11/22. The inclusion criteria included interventions that targeted disadvantaged populations which provided a component of clinical care that differed from standard maternity care.

resultsForty six index studies were included. Countries included Australia, Canada, Chile, Hong Kong, UK and USA. A narrative synthesis was undertaken, and results showed three intervention types: midwifery models of care, interdisciplinary care, and community-centred services. These intervention types have been delivered singularly but also in combination of each other demonstrating overlapping features. Overall, results show interventions had positive associations with primary (maternal, perinatal, and infant mortality) and secondary outcomes (experiences and satisfaction, antenatal care coverage, access to care, quality of care, mode of delivery, analgesia use in labour, preterm birth, low birth weight, breastfeeding, family planning, immunisations) however significance and impact vary. Midwifery models of care took an interpersonal and holistic approach as they focused on continuity of carer, home visiting, culturally and linguistically appropriate care and accessibility. Interdisciplinary care took a structural approach, to coordinate care for women requiring multi-agency health and social services. Community-centred services took a place-based approach with interventions that suited the need of its community and their norms.

conclusionTargeted interventions exist in HICs, but these vary according to the context and infrastructure of standard maternity care. Multi-interventional approaches could enhance a targeted approach for at risk populations, in particular combining midwifery models of care with community-centred approaches, to enhance accessibility, earlier engagement, and increased attendance.

trial registrationPROSPERO Registration number: CRD42020218357.

Indexed as

Maternal Health ServicesPremature BirthDeveloped CountriesFemaleHumansInfantInfant, NewbornPregnancySocial SupportSocial WorkCommunity careDisadvantageEthnic minorityHealth inequalityHigh-income countryInterdisciplinary careMidwife modelsSocial complexityTargeted intervention

Identifiers

PMID37434187
PMCPMC10334506
OpenAlexW4383913841

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.