Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37434174›Full record

SynthesisBiology of sex differences2023

Sex differences in the effects of prematurity and/or low birthweight on neurodevelopmental outcomes: systematic review and meta-analyses.

Julian K Christians, Saboura Ahmadzadeh-Seddeighi, Alishba Bilal, Anastasia Bogdanovic, Rebecca Ho, Estee V Leung, Megan A MacGregor, Nolan M Nadasdy, Gabriella M Principe

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Biology of sex differences, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Julian K ChristiansDepartment of Biological Sciences, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, BC, Canada. julian_christians@sfu.ca.ORCID 0000-0003-1797-0591
Saboura Ahmadzadeh-SeddeighiDepartment of Biological Sciences, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, BC, Canada.
Alishba BilalDepartment of Biological Sciences, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, BC, Canada.
Anastasia BogdanovicDepartment of Molecular Biology and Biochemistry, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, BC, Canada.
Rebecca HoDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Estee V LeungBiomedical Physiology and Kinesiology, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, BC, Canada.
Megan A MacGregorFaculty of Health Sciences, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, BC, Canada.
Nolan M NadasdyDepartment of Biological Sciences, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, BC, Canada.
Gabriella M PrincipeDepartment of Biological Sciences, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, BC, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPremature birth and/or low birthweight have long-lasting effects on cognition. The purpose of the present systematic review is to examine whether the effects of prematurity and/or low birth weight on neurodevelopmental outcomes differ between males and females.

methodsWeb of Science, Scopus, and Ovid MEDLINE were searched for studies of humans born premature and/or of low birthweight, where neurodevelopmental phenotypes were measured at 1 year of age or older. Studies must have reported outcomes in such a way that it was possible to assess whether effects were greater in one sex than the other. Risk of bias was assessed using both the Newcastle-Ottawa scale and the National Institutes of Health Quality assessment tool for observational cohort and cross-sectional studies.

resultsSeventy-five studies were included for descriptive synthesis, although only 24 presented data in a way that could be extracted for meta-analyses. Meta-analyses found that severe and moderate prematurity/low birthweight impaired cognitive function, and severe prematurity/low birthweight also increased internalizing problem scores. Moderate, but not severe, prematurity/low birthweight significantly increased externalizing problem scores. In no case did effects of prematurity/low birthweight differ between males and females. Heterogeneity among studies was generally high and significant, although age at assessment was not a significant moderator of effect. Descriptive synthesis did not identify an obvious excess or deficiency of male-biased or female-biased effects for any trait category. Individual study quality was generally good, and we found no evidence of publication bias.

conclusionsWe found no evidence that the sexes differ in their susceptibility to the effects of severe or moderate prematurity/low birthweight on cognitive function, internalizing traits or externalizing traits. Result heterogeneity tended to be high, but this reflects that one sex is not consistently more affected than the other. Frequently stated generalizations that one sex is more susceptible to prenatal adversity should be re-evaluated.

Indexed as

Premature BirthBirth WeightCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansInfant, Low Birth WeightInfant, NewbornMalePregnancySex CharacteristicsUnited StatesBirthweightCognitionCognitive functionExternalizing problemsGenderInternalizing problemsPrematuritySex differencesSystematic review

Identifiers

PMID37434174
PMCPMC10334669

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.