Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37434171›Full record

ArticleRadiation oncology (London, England)2023

Integrating plan complexity and dosiomics features with deep learning in patient-specific quality assurance for volumetric modulated arc therapy.

Ce Han, Ji Zhang, Bing Yu, Haoze Zheng, Yibo Wu, Zhixi Lin, Boda Ning, Jinling Yi, Congying Xie, Xiance Jin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Radiation oncology (London, England), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Ce Han *Department of Radiotherapy Center, 1st Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, China.
Ji Zhang *Department of Radiotherapy Center, 1st Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, China.
Bing YuDepartment of Radiotherapy Center, 1st Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, China.
Haoze ZhengDepartment of Radiotherapy Center, 1st Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, China.
Yibo WuDepartment of Radiotherapy Center, 1st Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, China.
Zhixi LinDepartment of Radiotherapy Center, 1st Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, China.
Boda NingDepartment of Radiotherapy Center, 1st Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, China.
Jinling YiDepartment of Radiotherapy Center, 1st Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, China.
Congying XieDepartment of Radiotherapy Center, 1st Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, China. wzxiecongying@163.com.
Xiance JinDepartment of Radiotherapy Center, 1st Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, China. jinxc1979@hotmail.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo investigate the feasibility and performance of deep learning (DL) models combined with plan complexity (PC) and dosiomics features in the patient-specific quality assurance (PSQA) for patients underwent volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT).

methodsTotal of 201 VMAT plans with measured PSQA results were retrospectively enrolled and divided into training and testing sets randomly at 7:3. PC metrics were calculated using house-built algorithm based on Matlab. Dosiomics features were extracted and selected using Random Forest (RF) from planning target volume (PTV) and overlap regions with 3D dose distributions. The top 50 dosiomics and 5 PC features were selected based on feature importance screening. A DL DenseNet was adapted and trained for the PSQA prediction.

resultsThe measured average gamma passing rate (GPR) of these VMAT plans was 97.94% ± 1.87%, 94.33% ± 3.22%, and 87.27% ± 4.81% at the criteria of 3%/3 mm, 3%/2 mm, and 2%/2 mm, respectively. Models with PC features alone demonstrated the lowest area under curve (AUC). The AUC and sensitivity of PC and dosiomics (D) combined model at 2%/2 mm were 0.915 and 0.833, respectively. The AUCs of DL models were improved from 0.943, 0.849, 0.841 to 0.948, 0.890, 0.942 in the combined models (PC + D + DL) at 3%/3 mm, 3%/2 mm and 2%/2 mm, respectively. A best AUC of 0.942 with a sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of 100%, 81.8%, and 83.6% was achieved with combined model (PC + D + DL) at 2%/2 mm.

conclusionsIntegrating DL with dosiomics and PC metrics is promising in the prediction of GPRs in PSQA for patients underwent VMAT.

Indexed as

Deep LearningRadiotherapy, Intensity-ModulatedAlgorithmsArea Under CurveHumansRetrospective StudiesClassificationDeep learningDosiomics featurePatient-specific quality assurancePlan complexity

Identifiers

PMID37434171
PMCPMC10334519

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.