ArticleBMC microbiology2023
Exploring Co-occurrence patterns and microbial diversity in the lung microbiome of patients with non-small cell lung cancer.
Article in BMC microbiology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Bronchoalveolar lavage microbiota signatures and stage-associated alterations in early-stage and advanced-stage non-small cell lung cancer: a pilot study.Journal of translational medicine · 2026Article
- Lung microbiome dynamics in health and lung cancer.Microbial genomics · 2025Review
- Microbial hallmarks of the respiratory tract in lung cancer: a meta-analysis.Frontiers in microbiomes · 2025Article
- Exploring the impact of breast cancer on colonization resistance of mouse microbiota using network node manipulation.Heliyon · 2024Article
- Probiotics in milk replacer affect the microbiome of the lung in neonatal dairy calves.Frontiers in microbiology · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIt has been demonstrated in the literature that a dysbiotic microbiome could have a negative impact on the host immune system and promote disease onset or exacerbation. Co-occurrence networks have been widely adopted to identify biomarkers and keystone taxa in the pathogenesis of microbiome-related diseases. Despite the promising results that network-driven approaches have led to in various human diseases, there is a dearth of research pertaining to key taxa that contribute to the pathogenesis of lung cancer. Therefore, our primary goal in this study is to explore co-existing relationships among members of the lung microbial community and any potential gained or lost interactions in lung cancer.
resultsUsing integrative and network-based approaches, we integrated four studies assessing the microbiome of lung biopsies of cancer patients. Differential abundance analyses showed that several bacterial taxa are different between tumor and tumor-adjacent normal tissues (FDR adjusted p-value < 0.05). Four, fifteen, and twelve significantly different associations were found at phylum, family, and genus levels. Diversity analyses suggested reduced alpha diversity in the tumor microbiome. However, beta diversity analysis did not show any discernible pattern between groups. In addition, four distinct modules of bacterial families were detected by the DBSCAN clustering method. Finally, in the co-occurrence network context, Actinobacteria, Firmicutes, Bacteroidetes, and Chloroflexi at the phylum level and Bifidobacterium, Massilia, Sphingobacterium, and Ochrobactrum at the genus level showed the highest degree of rewiring.
conclusionsDespite the absence of statistically significant differences in the relative abundance of certain taxa between groups, it is imperative not to overlook them for further exploration. This is because they may hold pivotal central roles in the broader network of bacterial taxa (e.g., Bifidobacterium and Massilia). These findings emphasize the importance of a network analysis approach for studying the lung microbiome since it could facilitate identifying key microbial taxa in lung cancer pathogenesis. Relying exclusively on differentially abundant taxa may not be enough to fully grasp the complex interplay between lung cancer and the microbiome. Therefore, a network-based approach can offer deeper insights and a more comprehensive understanding of the underlying mechanisms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.