ArticleJournal of cancer research and clinical oncology2023
Cuproptosis-related signature for clinical prognosis and immunotherapy sensitivity in hepatocellular carcinoma.
Article in Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- Cuproptosis in hepatocellular carcinoma: bridging copper homeostasis with therapeutic horizons.Molecular biology reports · 2026Review
- Dihydrolipoamide dehydrogenase promotes hepatocellular carcinoma progression and modulates cuproptosis-dependent cell death.Functional & integrative genomics · 2026Article
- Determination of Nitrogen Metabolism-Related Prognostic Signatures for Forecasting Bladder Cancer PrognosisEndocrine, metabolic & immune disorders drug targets · 2026Article
- Targeting cuproptosis in liver cancer: Molecular mechanisms and therapeutic implications.Apoptosis : an international journal on programmed cell death · 2025Review
- Exploring non-coding RNA expression profiles of AKR1B10P1, RP11-465B22.3, WASH8P, and NPM1P25 as a predictive model for hepatocellular carcinoma patient survival.Discover oncology · 2025Article
- The molecular mechanism of gemcitabine in inhibiting the HIF-1α/VEGFB/FGF2/FGFR1 signaling pathway for ovarian cancer treatment.Discover oncology · 2025Article
- Cuproptosis, ferroptosis and PANoptosis in tumor immune microenvironment remodeling and immunotherapy: culprits or new hope.Molecular cancer · 2024Review
- Review
- Identification of PANoptosis-related biomarkers and analysis of prognostic values in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Integrated analysis of histone lysine lactylation (Kla)-specific genes suggests that NR6A1, OSBP2 and UNC119B are novel therapeutic targets for hepatocellular carcinoma.Scientific reports · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundCopper homeostasis imbalance has been implicated in tumor progression, aggressiveness, and treatment response. However, the precise roles of cuproptosis-related genes (CRGs) in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) remain poorly understood.
methodsIn this study, we employed a consensus clustering algorithm to identify distinct molecular subtypes. We then performed Kaplan-Meier analysis and univariate Cox regression analysis to identify prognostic differentially expressed genes. The expression of these genes was subsequently validated using qPCR on fresh-frozen tissues obtained from HCC patients. Moreover, leveraging the TCGA-HCC cohort, we constructed a CRGs-related risk prediction model using the LASSO and multivariate Cox regression analysis.
resultsBy analyzing the data, we successfully established a CRGs risk prognostic model for HCC patients, comprising five differential genes (CAD, SGCB, TXNRD1, KDR, and MTND4P20). Cox regression analysis revealed that the CRGs risk score could serve as an independent prognostic factor for overall survival (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.308, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.200 - 1.426, P < 0.001). The area under the curve (AUC) values of the CRGs-score for predicting 1-year, 3-year, and 5-year survival rates were 0.785, 0.724, and 0.723, respectively. Notably, the expression levels of immune checkpoints (including PD-1, PD-L1, and CTLA4) significantly differed between the low- and high-risk score groups. Furthermore, the low-risk score group displayed increased sensitivity to sorafenib, cisplatin, cyclopamine, nilotinib, salubrinal, and gemcitabine, whereas the high-risk score group exhibited heightened sensitivity to lapatinib, erlotinib, and gefitinib.
conclusionsOur findings highlight the potential of the CRGs risk score as an independent and promising biomarker for clinical prognosis and immunotherapy sensitivity in HCC patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.