Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37434067›Full record

ArticleAdvances in therapy2023

A Podcast Discussion on the Current Treatment Landscape for Renal Cell Carcinoma.

Philipp Ivanyi, Jonas Paul Wiegmann, Hendrik Eggers, Viktor Grünwald

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Advances in therapy, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Philipp IvanyiDepartment for Hematology, Hemostasis, Oncology and Stem Cell Transplantation, Claudia von Schilling-Center, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Hannover Medical School, OE 6860, Carl-Neuberg Str.1, 30625, Hannover, Germany. Ivanyi.philipp@mh-hannover.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2862-7302
Jonas Paul WiegmannDepartment for Hematology, Hemostasis, Oncology and Stem Cell Transplantation, Claudia von Schilling-Center, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Hannover Medical School, OE 6860, Carl-Neuberg Str.1, 30625, Hannover, Germany.
Hendrik EggersDepartment for Hematology, Hemostasis, Oncology and Stem Cell Transplantation, Claudia von Schilling-Center, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Hannover Medical School, OE 6860, Carl-Neuberg Str.1, 30625, Hannover, Germany.
Viktor GrünwaldDepartment for Urology, Department for Medical Oncology, Interdisciplinary Uro-Oncology, West-German Cancer Center, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

During the last 15 years, tremendous efforts have been made in the medical treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC). Immune-oncological (IO) combinations are the current standard of care in the first-line setting of mRCC. Here, the current phase 3 trials CM214 (nivolumab/ipilimumab vs. sunitinib), KN426 (axitinib/pembrolizumab vs. sunitinib), Javelin-ren-101 (axitinib/avelumab vs. sunitinib), CM9ER (cabozantinib/nivolumab vs. sunitinib), and CLEAR (lenvatinib/pembrolizumab vs. sunitinib) were discussed. In the mentioned phase 3 trials, primary and secondary endpoints were discussed. Strengths and weaknesses of each trial were reflected in terms of overall survival, progression-free survival, objective remission, health quality of life, and safety. Reflecting on the data, as well as the current ESMO guidelines, we discuss choosing the appropriate medical treatment for patients' individualized treatment journey and relay the strength and weaknesses of each combination-starting with the appropriate first-line therapy.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, Renal CellKidney NeoplasmsAxitinibHumansNivolumabQuality of LifeSunitinibAxitinibNivolumabSunitinibCPI-CPIFirst line treatmentMedical treatmentmRCCPD1/TKI

Identifiers

PMID37434067
PMCPMC10427512

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.