ArticleInvestigational new drugs2023
Idarubicin versus epirubicin in drug-eluting beads-transarterial chemoembolization for treating hepatocellular carcinoma: A real-world retrospective study.
Article in Investigational new drugs, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Clinical and Radiological Outcomes Comparison of Degradable Starch Microspheres TACE with Idarubicin vs. Epirubicin Protocol in Patients with HCC.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Research Progress on Quinone Compounds for the Treatment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma.Biomolecules · 2025Review
- Anthracycline selection in drug-eluting-beads-transarterial chemoembolization (DEB-TACE) for hepatocellular carcinoma: emerging evidence for idarubicin.Hepatobiliary surgery and nutrition · 2025Article
- Relationships Among Serological Indicators andCombinatorial chemistry & high throughput screening · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of idarubicin-loaded drug-eluting beads-transarterial chemoembolization (IDA-TACE) and epirubicin-loaded drug-eluting beads-TACE (EPI-TACE) in treating hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). All patients with HCC treated with TACE in our hospital between June 2020 and January 2022 were screened. The included patients were divided into the IDA-TACE group and EPI-TACE group to compare overall survival (OS), time to progression (TTP), objective response rate (ORR), and adverse events. There were 55 patients each in the IDA-TACE and EPI-TACE groups. Compared with the EPI-TACE group, the median TTP in the IDA-TACE group was not significantly different (10.50 vs. 9.23 months; HR 0.68; 95% CI 0.40-1.16; P = 0.154), whereas the survival status in the IDA-TACE group tended to be better (neither achieved; HR 0.47; 95% CI 0.22-1.02; P = 0.055). Based on the Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer staging system for subgroup analysis, considering stage C patients, the IDA-TACE group performed significantly better in terms of ORR (77.1% vs. 54.3%, P = 0.044), median TTP (10.93 vs. 5.20 months; HR 0.46; 95% CI 0.24-0.89; P = 0.021), and median OS (not achieved vs. 17.80 months; HR 0.41; 95% CI 0.18-0.93; P = 0.033). Considering stage B patients, there were no significant differences between the IDA-TACE and EPI-TACE groups in terms of ORR (80.0% vs. 80.0%, P = 1.000), median TTP (10.20 vs. 11.2 months; HR 1.41; 95% CI 0.54-3.65; P = 0.483), or median OS (neither achieved, HR 0.47; 95% CI 0.04-5.24; P = 0.543). Notably, leukopenia was more common in the IDA-TACE group (20.0%, P = 0.052), and fever was more common in the EPI-TACE group (49.1%, P = 0.010). IDA-TACE was more effective than EPI-TACE in treating advanced-stage HCC and comparable in treating intermediate-stage HCC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.