ReviewHerzschrittmachertherapie & Elektrophysiologie2023
[Legal aspects of telemedicine in cardiology in Germany].
Review in Herzschrittmachertherapie & Elektrophysiologie, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Since 2016, quarterly telemedical remote monitoring of patients with an implanted defibrillator or cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) system is part of the Einheitlichen Bewertungsmaßstab (EBM, physician's fee schedule) and is the first telemedical service to be reimbursed in German cardiology. Many publications like the TIM-HF2 or the InTime trial have shown a significant benefit for different endpoints in patients with advanced heart failure. Therefore, the German Society of Cardiology (DGK) has published different recommendations that emphasize an obvious indication of telemedical care with daily control of implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) information, parameters like blood pressure and weight, and telemedical counselling of patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction. This recommendation is also part of the guidelines of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) published in 2021. It has a level IIb for patients with heart failure. In December 2020 the "Gemeinsame Bundesausschuss" (G-BA) decided to accept telemonitoring as a diagnostic tool and treatment option for patients with heart failure. This service of physicians became part of the EBM and ever since may be offered to patients. This development is accompanied with many questions regarding a physician's accountability, protection of data privacy, and also regarding the structures given by the G‑BA and the "Kassenärztlichen Vereinigungen" (KV). Thus, this paper tries to give an overview of these topics. It will also provide a critical discussion of these structures and their legal foundation because there are many constraints that need to be taken into consideration as a cardiologist. These constraints may ultimately hinder the expansion of this service to patients in Germany.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.