Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37434021›Full record

ReviewEuropean spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society2023

Intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring in scoliosis surgery: literature review of the last 10 years.

Audrey Angelliaume, Toul-la Alhada, Henry-François Parent, Julia Royer, Luke Harper

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
4.4field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Audrey AngelliaumeSpine Center, 6 rue de Bellinière, 49800, Trélazé, France. angelliaume.audrey@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6872-5038
Toul-la AlhadaDepartment of Pediatric Surgery, Pellegrin University Hospital, Place Amélie Raba-Léon, 33000, Bordeaux, France.
Henry-François ParentSpine Center, 6 rue de Bellinière, 49800, Trélazé, France.
Julia RoyerDepartment of Pediatric Surgery, Pellegrin University Hospital, Place Amélie Raba-Léon, 33000, Bordeaux, France.
Luke HarperDepartment of Pediatric Surgery, Pellegrin University Hospital, Place Amélie Raba-Léon, 33000, Bordeaux, France.
Hôpital Pellegrin · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionPatients with spinal deformities undergoing corrective surgery are at risk for iatrogenic spinal cord injury (SCI) and subsequent neurological deficit. Intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring (IONM) allows early detection of SCI which enables early intervention resulting in a better prognosis. The primary aim of this literature review was to search if there are threshold values of TcMEP and SSEP in the literature that are widely accepted as alert during IONM. The secondary aim was to update knowledge concerning IONM during scoliosis surgery.

methodPubMed/MEDLINE and Cochrane library electronic databases were used to search publication from 2012 to 2022. The following keywords were used: evoked potential, scoliosis, surgery, intraoperative monitoring and neurophysiological. We included all studies dealing with SSEP and TcMEP monitoring during scoliosis surgery. Two authors reviewed all titles and abstracts to identify studies that met the inclusion criteria.

resultsWe included 43 papers. Rates of IONM alert and neurological deficit varied from 0.56 to 64% and from 0.15 to 8.3%, respectively. Threshold values varied from a loss of 50 to 90% for TcMEP amplitude, whereas it seems that a loss of 50% in amplitude and/or an increase of 10% of latency is widely accepted for SSEP. Causes of IONM changes most frequently reported were surgical maneuver.

conclusionConcerning SSEP, a loss of 50% in amplitude and/or an increase of 10% of latency is widely accepted as an alert. For TcMEP, it seems that the use of highest threshold values can avoid unnecessary surgical procedure for the patient without increasing risk of neurological deficit.

Indexed as

Intraoperative Neurophysiological MonitoringScoliosisSpinal Cord InjuriesEvoked Potentials, MotorEvoked Potentials, SomatosensoryHumansNeurosurgical ProceduresRetrospective StudiesIntraoperativeNeurophysiological monitoringScoliosisSurgery

Identifiers

PMID37434021
OpenAlexW4383874492

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.