Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37434014›Full record

ArticlePharmacoEconomics2023

Vaccinating the German Population Aged 60 Years and Over with a Quadrivalent High-Dose Inactivated Influenza Vaccine Compared to Standard-Dose Vaccines: A Transmission and Budget Impact Model.

Kathrin Pahmeier, Christian Speckemeier, Silke Neusser, Jürgen Wasem, Janine Biermann-Stallwitz

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PharmacoEconomics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Kathrin Pahmeier *Institute for Healthcare Management and Research, University of Duisburg-Essen, Thea-Leymann-Str. 9, 45127, Essen, Germany. kathrin.pahmeier@medman.uni-due.de.ORCID 0000-0001-7259-5769
Christian Speckemeier *Essener Forschungsinstitut für Medizinmanagement (EsFoMed) GmbH, Bredeneyer Str. 2b, 45133, Essen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-7507-4432
Silke NeusserEssener Forschungsinstitut für Medizinmanagement (EsFoMed) GmbH, Bredeneyer Str. 2b, 45133, Essen, Germany.
Jürgen WasemInstitute for Healthcare Management and Research, University of Duisburg-Essen, Thea-Leymann-Str. 9, 45127, Essen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-9653-168X
Janine Biermann-StallwitzEssener Forschungsinstitut für Medizinmanagement (EsFoMed) GmbH, Bredeneyer Str. 2b, 45133, Essen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-5683-3747
Essen University Hospital · DEUniversity of Duisburg-Essen · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

objectiveIn Germany, influenza vaccination is mainly advised for persons aged 60 years and over and individuals with health risks. Since 2021, an inactivated, quadrivalent high-dose influenza vaccine (IIV4-HD) has been recommended for persons aged 60 years and over. The aim of this study was to calculate the impact of vaccinating the German population aged 60 years and over with IIV4-HD compared to standard-dose influenza vaccines (IIV4-SD) with regard to health outcomes and costs.

methodsAn age-stratified deterministic compartment model was built to simulate the course of influenza infection for the German population in the season 2019/20. Probabilities for health outcomes and cost data were searched from the literature and were used to compare the influenza-related health and economic effects for different scenarios. Perspectives were those of the statutory health insurance and the society. Deterministic sensitivity analyses were conducted.

resultsFrom the statutory health insurance perspective, vaccinating the German population aged 60 years and over with IIV4-HD would have prevented 277,026 infections (- 1.1%) with an increase of overall direct costs of €224 million (+ 40.1%) compared with IIV4-SD. A separate analysis showed that increased vaccination of 75% (World Health Organization recommendation for older age groups) in persons aged 60 years and over using IIV4-SD only would prevent 1,289,648 infections (- 5.1%) and would save costs from a statutory health insurance perspective of €103 million (- 13.2%) compared with IIV4-HD at actual vaccination rates.

conclusionsThe modeling approach offers important insights into the epidemiological and budgetary impact of different vaccination scenarios. Achieving a higher vaccination coverage with IIV4-SD in persons aged 60 years and over would result in lower costs and fewer influenza infections compared with the scenario with IIV4-HD and actual vaccination rates.

Indexed as

Influenza, HumanInfluenza VaccinesAgedCost-Benefit AnalysisHumansMiddle AgedProbabilityVaccinationVaccines, InactivatedInfluenza VaccinesVaccines, Inactivated

Identifiers

PMID37434014
PMCPMC10570167
OpenAlexW4383874248

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.