Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37433950›Full record

ArticleJournal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract2023

Impact of Tumor Size and Management on Survival in Small Gastric Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors.

Kristen E Rhodin, Isabel F DeLaura, Elizabeth Horne, Alex Bartholomew, Thomas C Howell, Elishama Kanu, Sabran Masoud, Michael E Lidsky, Daniel P Nussbaum, Dan G Blazer

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. EndoscopicWorld journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Kristen E RhodinDepartment of Surgery, Duke University, 2301 Erwin Road, Durham, NC, 27710, USA. kristen.rhodin@duke.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-3249-5330
Isabel F DeLauraDepartment of Surgery, Duke University, 2301 Erwin Road, Durham, NC, 27710, USA.
Elizabeth HorneDepartment of Surgery, Duke University, 2301 Erwin Road, Durham, NC, 27710, USA.
Alex BartholomewDepartment of Surgery, Duke University, 2301 Erwin Road, Durham, NC, 27710, USA.
Thomas C HowellDepartment of Surgery, Duke University, 2301 Erwin Road, Durham, NC, 27710, USA.
Elishama KanuDepartment of Surgery, Duke University, 2301 Erwin Road, Durham, NC, 27710, USA.
Sabran MasoudDepartment of Surgery, Duke University, 2301 Erwin Road, Durham, NC, 27710, USA.
Michael E LidskyDepartment of Surgery, Duke University, 2301 Erwin Road, Durham, NC, 27710, USA.
Daniel P NussbaumDepartment of Surgery, Duke University, 2301 Erwin Road, Durham, NC, 27710, USA.
Dan G BlazerDepartment of Surgery, Duke University, 2301 Erwin Road, Durham, NC, 27710, USA.
Duke University · US

Funding

Women's Cancer Research ProgramP30CA014236 · NCI · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI JOHN N. NORTON · 1985 to 2026
$174.8M
Stimulating Access to Research in Residency (StARR) - NIAIDR38AI140297 · NIAID · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI Rachel G Greenberg, David H. Harpole · 2018 to 2026
$2.4M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA014236NIAID NIH HHS R38 AI140297
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSociety guidelines remain inconsistent on the role of endoscopic and radiographic surveillance as an alternative to surgical resection of small gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs). Herein, we aimed to assess survival among patients with gastric GISTs undergoing observation versus surgical resection, stratified by tumor size.

methodsThe National Cancer Database (NCDB) was queried for gastric GISTs < 2 cm diagnosed from 2010-2017. Patients were stratified by management strategy-observation vs surgical resection. The primary outcome, overall survival (OS), was examined with Kaplan-Meier and multivariable Cox proportional hazard methods. Subgroup analyses were conducted on tumors < 1 cm and 1-2 cm in size.

resultsAltogether, 1208 patients were identified: 439 (36.3%) undergoing observation and 769 (63.7%) receiving surgical resection. In the overall cohort, patients undergoing surgical resection demonstrated improved survival (93.6 vs. 88.8% 5-year OS, p=0.02). In multivariable analysis, upfront surgical resection was not associated with a reduction in mortality; however, there was a significant interaction with tumor size. For patients with tumors < 1 cm, there was no difference in survival based on management strategy. However, resection of tumors 1-2 cm was associated with improved survival relative to surveillance.

conclusionsWhile surgical resection and surveillance were associated with similar survival for patients with gastric GISTs < 1 cm, this NCDB analysis suggests that patients with tumor size ≥ 1 cm may benefit from upfront surgical resection. Prospective studies comparing these two approaches and their impact on recurrence-free and disease-specific survival are needed to better align consensus guidelines and recommendations.

Indexed as

Gastrointestinal Stromal TumorsLaparoscopyStomach NeoplasmsHumansProspective StudiesRetrospective StudiesTreatment Outcomegastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST)sarcomasoft tissue tumorssurgical resection

Identifiers

PMID37433950
PMCPMC10592390
OpenAlexW4383897035

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.