Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37433915›Full record

ArticleSurgical endoscopy2023

The optimal interval of surveillance gastroscopy after endoscopic resection for gastric neoplasia: a multicenter cohort study.

Younghee Choe, Byung-Wook Kim, Tae Ho Kim, Jun-Won Chung, Jongwon Kim, Soo-Young Na, Joon Sung Kim

Abstract readMulticenter Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Surgical endoscopy, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Guideline
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Younghee ChoeDivision of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Incheon St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Byung-Wook KimDivision of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Incheon St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Republic of Korea. gastro@catholic.ac.kr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2290-4954
Tae Ho KimDivision of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Bucheon St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Jun-Won ChungDivision of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Gachon University Gil Medical Center, Incheon, Republic of Korea.
Jongwon KimDivision of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Incheon St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Soo-Young NaDivision of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Incheon St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Joon Sung KimDivision of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Incheon St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
The Catholic University of Korea Incheon St. Mary's Hospital · KRGachon University Gil Medical Center · KRThe Catholic University of Korea Bucheon St. Mary's Hospital · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND/

aimsDue to the possible metachronous recurrence of gastric neoplasia, surveillance gastroscopy is mandatory after endoscopic resection for gastric neoplasia. However, there is no consensus on the surveillance gastroscopy interval. This study aimed to find an optimal interval of surveillance gastroscopy and to investigate the risk factors for metachronous gastric neoplasia.

methodsMedical records were reviewed retrospectively in patients who underwent endoscopic resection for gastric neoplasia in 3 teaching hospitals from June 2012 to July 2022. Patients were divided into two groups; annual surveillance vs. biannual surveillance. The incidence of metachronous gastric neoplasia was identified, and the risk factors for metachronous gastric neoplasia were investigated.

resultsAmong the 1,533 patients who underwent endoscopic resection for gastric neoplasia, 677 patients were enrolled in this study (annual surveillance 302, biannual surveillance 375). Metachronous gastric neoplasia was observed in 61 patients (annual surveillance 26/302, biannual surveillance 32/375, P = 0.989), and metachronous gastric adenocarcinoma was observed in 26 patients (annual surveillance 13/302, biannual surveillance 13/375, P = 0.582). All the lesions were removed by endoscopic resection successfully. In a multivariate analysis, severe atrophic gastritis on gastroscopy was an independent risk factor for metachronous gastric adenocarcinoma (odds ratio 3.8, 95% confidence interval 1.4‒10.1; P = 0.008).

conclusionsMeticulous observation to detect the metachronous gastric neoplasia is necessary for patients with severe atrophic gastritis during follow-up gastroscopy after endoscopic resection for gastric neoplasia. Annual surveillance gastroscopy might be enough after endoscopic resection for gastric neoplasia.

Indexed as

AdenocarcinomaGastritis, AtrophicHelicobacter InfectionsNeoplasms, Second PrimaryStomach NeoplasmsGastric MucosaGastroscopyHumansRetrospective StudiesRisk FactorsEndoscopic resectionMetachronous neoplasiaStomach neoplasmsSurveillance

Identifiers

PMID37433915
OpenAlexW4383879248

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.