ArticleScientific reports2023
Transfer-learning is a key ingredient to fast deep learning-based 4D liver MRI reconstruction.
Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- A Systematic Review and Identification of the Challenges of Deep Learning Techniques for Undersampled Magnetic Resonance Image Reconstruction.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Pooled it
- Fully automated diaphragm segmentation on routine 2D-cine and 3D thoracic MRI: multireader validation.European radiology experimental · 2026Article
- Artificial intelligence in four-dimensional imaging for motion management in radiation therapy.Artificial intelligence review · 2025Article
- A review of deep learning-based reconstruction methods for accelerated MRI using spatiotemporal and multi-contrast redundancies.Biomedical engineering letters · 2024Review
- Cerebrovascular diagnosis using CTA-based intracranial aneurysm classification via transfer learning and Grad-CAM visualization.Frontiers in neurologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Time-resolved volumetric magnetic resonance imaging (4D MRI) could be used to address organ motion in image-guided interventions like tumor ablation. Current 4D reconstruction techniques are unsuitable for most interventional settings because they are limited to specific breathing phases, lack temporal/spatial resolution, and have long prior acquisitions or reconstruction times. Deep learning-based (DL) 4D MRI approaches promise to overcome these shortcomings but are sensitive to domain shift. This work shows that transfer learning (TL) combined with an ensembling strategy can help alleviate this key challenge. We evaluate four approaches: pre-trained models from the source domain, models directly trained from scratch on target domain data, models fine-tuned from a pre-trained model and an ensemble of fine-tuned models. For that the data base was split into 16 source and 4 target domain subjects. Comparing ensemble of fine-tuned models (N = 10) with directly learned models, we report significant improvements (P < 0.001) of the root mean squared error (RMSE) of up to 12% and the mean displacement (MDISP) of up to 17.5%. The smaller the target domain data amount, the larger the effect. This shows that TL + Ens significantly reduces beforehand acquisition time and improves reconstruction quality, rendering it a key component in making 4D MRI clinically feasible for the first time in the context of 4D organ motion models of the liver and beyond.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.