Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37433821›Full record

ArticleNature communications2023

Predicting scale-dependent chromatin polymer properties from systematic coarse-graining.

Sangram Kadam, Kiran Kumari, Vinoth Manivannan, Shuvadip Dutta, Mithun K Mitra, Ranjith Padinhateeri

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Bridging spatial and temporal scales of developmental gene regulation.Current opinion in genetics & development · 2025
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Regulation of Chromatin Architecture by Transcription Factor Binding.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2023
    Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Sangram KadamDepartment of Biosciences and Bioengineering, Indian Institute of Technology Bombay, Mumbai, 400076, India. sangramkadam@iitb.ac.in.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3314-6383
Kiran KumariDepartment of Biosciences and Bioengineering, Indian Institute of Technology Bombay, Mumbai, 400076, India.
Vinoth ManivannanDepartment of Biosciences and Bioengineering, Indian Institute of Technology Bombay, Mumbai, 400076, India.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2704-1836
Shuvadip DuttaDepartment of Physics, Indian Institute of Technology Bombay, Mumbai, 400076, India.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4373-1589
Mithun K MitraDepartment of Physics, Indian Institute of Technology Bombay, Mumbai, 400076, India.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1777-7356
Ranjith PadinhateeriDepartment of Biosciences and Bioengineering, Indian Institute of Technology Bombay, Mumbai, 400076, India. ranjithp@iitb.ac.in.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5485-1474

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Simulating chromatin is crucial for predicting genome organization and dynamics. Although coarse-grained bead-spring polymer models are commonly used to describe chromatin, the relevant bead dimensions, elastic properties, and the nature of inter-bead potentials are unknown. Using nucleosome-resolution contact probability (Micro-C) data, we systematically coarse-grain chromatin and predict quantities essential for polymer representation of chromatin. We compute size distributions of chromatin beads for different coarse-graining scales, quantify fluctuations and distributions of bond lengths between neighboring regions, and derive effective spring constant values. Unlike the prevalent notion, our findings argue that coarse-grained chromatin beads must be considered as soft particles that can overlap, and we derive an effective inter-bead soft potential and quantify an overlap parameter. We also compute angle distributions giving insights into intrinsic folding and local bendability of chromatin. While the nucleosome-linker DNA bond angle naturally emerges from our work, we show two populations of local structural states. The bead sizes, bond lengths, and bond angles show different mean behavior at Topologically Associating Domain (TAD) boundaries and TAD interiors. We integrate our findings into a coarse-grained polymer model and provide quantitative estimates of all model parameters, which can serve as a foundational basis for all future coarse-grained chromatin simulations.

Indexed as

Chromatinalpha-GlobinsAnimalsGenomeMiceModels, MolecularMouse Embryonic Stem CellsNucleosomesProtein Structure, Tertiaryalpha-GlobinsChromatinNucleosomes

Identifiers

PMID37433821
PMCPMC10336007

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.