Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37433723›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2023

General practitioners ending their practice and impact on patients' health, healthcare use and mortality: a protocol for national registry cohort studies in Norway, 2008 to 2021.

Kristin Hestmann Vinjerui, Kjartan Sarheim Anthun, Andreas Asheim, Fredrik Carlsen, Bente Prytz Mjølstad, Sara Marie Nilsen, Kristine Pape, Johan H Bjorngaard

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 32% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Kristin Hestmann VinjeruiDepartment of Public Health and Nursing, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway kristin.vinjerui@ntnu.no.ORCID 0000-0003-1828-6943
Kjartan Sarheim AnthunDepartment of Public Health and Nursing, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway.
Andreas AsheimCenter for Health Care Improvement, Trondheim University Hospital, Trondheim, Norway.ORCID 0000-0001-7682-6958
Fredrik CarlsenDepartment of Economics, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway.
Bente Prytz MjølstadDepartment of Public Health and Nursing, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway.
Sara Marie NilsenCenter for Health Care Improvement, Regionalt senter for helsetjenesteutvikling, St. Olavs hospital, Trondheim, Norway.
Kristine PapeDepartment of Public Health and Nursing, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway.
Johan H BjorngaardDepartment of Public Health and Nursing, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway.
Norwegian University of Science and Technology · NOSINTEF · NOSt Olav's University Hospital · NO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionContinuous general practitioner (GP) and patient relations associate with positive health outcomes. Termination of GP practice is unavoidable, while consequences of final breaks in relations are less explored. We will study how an ended GP relation affects patient's healthcare utilisation and mortality compared with patients with a continuous GP relation. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: We link national registries data on individual GP affiliation, sociodemographic characteristics, healthcare use and mortality. From 2008 to 2021, we identify patients whose GP stopped practicing and will compare acute and elective, primary and specialist healthcare use and mortality, with patients whose GP did not stop practicing. We match GP-patient pairs on age and sex (both), immigrant status and education (patients), and number of patients and practice period (GPs). We analyse the outcomes before and after an ended GP-patient relation, using Poisson regression with high-dimensional fixed effects. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This study protocol is part of the approved project Improved Decisions with Causal Inference in Health Services Research, 2016/2159/REK Midt (the Regional Committees for Medical and Health Research Ethics) and does not require consent. HUNT Cloud provides secure data storage and computing. We will report using the STROBE guideline for observational case-control studies and publish in peer-reviewed journals, accessible in NTNU Open and present at scientific conferences. To reach a broader audience, we will summarise articles in the project's web page, regular and social media, and disseminate to relevant stakeholders.

Indexed as

General PracticeGeneral PractitionersCohort StudiesHumansNorwayRegistriesEPIDEMIOLOGIC STUDIESHEALTH SERVICES ADMINISTRATION & MANAGEMENTPRIMARY CARE

Identifiers

PMID37433723
PMCPMC10347473
OpenAlexW4383896718

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.