Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37433694›Full record

ArticleBMJ global health2023

AVIVA: a telehealth tool to improve cervical cancer screening in resource-constrained settings.

Olabanjo Okunlola Ogunsola, John Olajide Olawepo, Oluseye Ajayi, Emmanuel Osayi, Yewande Toluwabori Akinro, Chukwuemeka Ifechelobi, Chibuike Chigbu, Prosper Okonkwo, Echezona Edozie Ezeanolue

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ global health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Olabanjo Okunlola OgunsolaPrevention and Community Services, APIN Public Health Initiatives, Abuja, Nigeria oogunsola@apin.org.ng.ORCID 0000-0001-9601-0518
John Olajide OlawepoCenter For Translation and Implementation Research, University of Nigeria, Nsukka, Nigeria.ORCID 0000-0001-6732-1042
Oluseye AjayiPrevention and Community Services, APIN Public Health Initiatives, Abuja, Nigeria.
Emmanuel OsayiClinical Services, APIN Public Health Initiatives, Abuja, Nigeria.
Yewande Toluwabori AkinroClinical Services, APIN Public Health Initiatives, Abuja, Nigeria.
Chukwuemeka IfechelobiStrategic Information, APIN Public Health Initiatives, Abuja, Nigeria.
Chibuike ChigbuCenter For Translation and Implementation Research, University of Nigeria, Nsukka, Nigeria.
Prosper OkonkwoAPIN Public Health Initiatives, Abuja, Nigeria.
Echezona Edozie EzeanolueCenter For Translation and Implementation Research, University of Nigeria, Nsukka, Nigeria.ORCID 0000-0002-6294-9479
AIDS Prevention Initiative in Nigeria · NGUniversity of Nigeria · NG

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cervical cancer accounts for 21.7% of all cancer deaths in the sub-Saharan Africa with a case fatality rate of 68%. Nigeria's Federal Ministry of Health has adopted cervical cancer screening (CCS) using visual inspection with acetic acid or Lugol's iodine (VIA/VILI) and cryotherapy treatment for precancerous lesions as the preferred screening and treatment strategy. Using the Exploration, Preparation, Implementation and Sustainment Framework, our study documents our experience during the development, piloting and roll-out of the APIN Public Health Initiatives (APIN)-developed VIA Visual Application (AVIVA) for CCS using the VIA method in 86 APIN-supported health facilities across 7 states in Nigeria. Between December 2019 and June 2022, with the aid of 9 gynaecologists and 133 case finders, a total of 29 262 women living with HIV received VIA-based CCS and 1609 of them were VIA-positive, corresponding to VIA positivity rate of 5.5%. Over the 30 months duration and the 5 phases of CCS scale-up, AVIVA development and expansion, a total of 1247 cases were shared via the AVIVA App (3741 pictures), with 1058 of such cases undergoing expert review, corresponding to a reviewer rate of 84.8%. Overall, the use of the AVIVA App improved both the VIA-positive and VIA-negative concordance rates by 16 percentage points each (26%-42% and 80%-96%, respectively) from baseline to the end of the study. We concluded that the AVIVA App is an innovative tool to improve CCS rates and diagnostic precision by connecting health facility staff and expert reviewers in resource-limited settings.

Indexed as

TelemedicineUterine Cervical NeoplasmsAcetic AcidEarly Detection of CancerFemaleGynecologistsHumansAcetic AcidCancerHIVScreening

Identifiers

PMID37433694
PMCPMC10347443
OpenAlexW4383895093

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.