Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37433629›Full record

ArticleRespiratory care2023

Esophageal Pressure Measurement: A Primer.

Eduardo Mireles-Cabodevila, Michael Fischer, Samuel Wiles, Robert L Chatburn

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Respiratory care, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Eduardo Mireles-CabodevilaRespiratory Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio. mirelee@ccf.org.
Michael FischerRespiratory Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio.
Samuel WilesRespiratory Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio.
Robert L ChatburnRespiratory Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio.
Cleveland Clinic · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Over the last decade, the literature exploring clinical applications for esophageal manometry in critically ill patients has increased. New mechanical ventilators and bedside monitors allow measurement of esophageal pressures easily at the bedside. The bedside clinician can now evaluate the magnitude and timing of esophageal pressure swings to evaluate respiratory muscle activity and transpulmonary pressures. The respiratory therapist has all the tools to perform these measurements to optimize mechanical ventilation delivery. However, as with any measurement, technique, fidelity, and accuracy are paramount. This primer highlights key knowledge necessary to perform measurements and highlights areas of both uncertainty and ongoing development.

Indexed as

Positive-Pressure RespirationRespiratory Distress SyndromeHumansManometryPressureRespiration, Artificialesophageal pressure measurementlung-protective ventilationmechanical ventilationPEEPrespiratory system driving pressuretranspulmonary driving pressure

Identifiers

PMID37433629
PMCPMC10468172
OpenAlexW4383875881

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.