ArticleDevelopmental biology2023
A simple method to dramatically increase C. elegans germline microinjection efficiency.
Article in Developmental biology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- FLInt 2.0: robust and customizable single-shot integration in C. elegans.G3 (Bethesda, Md.) · 2026Article
- Polarized SOS activity orchestrates FGF-directed cell migration in vivo.Current biology : CB · 2026Article
- Engineering the Caenorhabditis elegans genome with a nested, self-excising selection cassette.Genetics · 2026Article
- Automated Platforms inMicromachines · 2025Review
- FGF diffusion is required for directed migration of postembryonic muscle progenitors in C. elegans.Development (Cambridge, England) · 2025Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Genome manipulation methods in C. elegans require microinjecting DNA or ribonucleoprotein complexes into the microscopic core of the gonadal syncytium. These microinjections are technically demanding and represent a key bottleneck for all genome engineering and transgenic approaches in C. elegans. While there have been steady improvements in the ease and efficiency of genetic methods for C. elegans genome manipulation, there have not been comparable advances in the physical process of microinjection. Here, we report a simple and inexpensive method for handling worms using a paintbrush during the injection process that nearly tripled average microinjection rates compared to traditional worm handling methods. We found that the paintbrush increased injection throughput by substantially increasing both injection speeds and post-injection survival rates. In addition to dramatically and universally increasing injection efficiency for experienced personnel, the paintbrush method also significantly improved the abilities of novice investigators to perform key steps in the microinjection process. We expect that this method will benefit the C. elegans community by increasing the speed at which new strains can be generated and will also make microinjection-based approaches less challenging and more accessible to personnel and labs without extensive experience.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.