Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37432618›Full record

ReviewAdvances in experimental medicine and biology2023

Histopathology of Meningiomas.

Aditya Raghunathan, Caterina Giannini

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Advances in experimental medicine and biology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. The Molecular and Immunological Landscape of Meningiomas.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Aditya RaghunathanDepartment of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Caterina GianniniDepartment of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA. Giannini.Caterina@mayo.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Meningiomas are considered to arise from meningothelial cells, whose cytomorphology they recapitulate. In this chapter, we review the characteristic histological features of meningioma, including classic architectural and cytological features. There exists a broad spectrum of morphological variants of meningioma. The 2021 WHO Classification recognizes nine benign (grade 1), three intermediate-grade (grade 2), and three malignant (grade 3) variants. We review the characteristic histological features of these meningioma variants, describe immunohistochemical stains, which may assist with establishing a diagnosis, and discuss differential diagnostic considerations that may prove challenging for a diagnosis of meningioma.

Indexed as

Meningeal NeoplasmsMeningiomaEpithelial CellsHumansAnaplasticAtypicalBenignClassificationDiagnosisImmunohistochemistryWHO grade

Identifiers

PMID37432618

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.