ReviewAnnals of intensive care2023
Trends in ICU mortality and underlying risk over three decades among mechanically ventilated patients. A group level analysis of cohorts from infection prevention studies.
Review in Annals of intensive care, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed.
- Resistance training and β-hydroxy-β-methylbutyrate for functional recovery in critical illness: a multicenter 2 × 2 factorial randomized trial.Critical care (London, England) · 2025Trial
- Are arms-based methods required to test the stable unit treatment value assumption (SUTVA) among Cochrane reviews of contagious infection prevention interventions?Global epidemiology · 2026Article
- Decreasing admissions in older and increasing mortality in younger patients: a nationwide observational study of all German ICU cases 2011-2022.Critical care (London, England) · 2026Observational
- Transitions and determinants of ICU-acquired frailty after critical illness: A multicenter cohort study using a multistate Markov model.Annals of intensive care · 2026Article
- Factors of pre-existing low muscle mass and its relationship with mortality in critically ill patients: a sex-specific analysis.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Development and validation of a prediction score for early identification of palliative care needs for patients in the intensive care unit: a multicentre retrospective cohort study.EClinicalMedicine · 2025Article
- Systematic reviews and the Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy; past, present and future. A systematic reappraisal.The Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy · 2025Article
- The hidden dangers in routine medical complaints: uncovering patient harm.BMC health services research · 2025Article
- Visualizing and diagnosing spillover within randomized concurrent controlled trials through the application of diagnostic test assessment methods.BMC medical research methodology · 2024Article
- Intensive Care Unit Nurses' Experiences in Caring for End-of-Life Patients in Saudi Arabia: A Qualitative Study.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2024Article
- Investigating Why Clinicians Deviate from Standards of Care: Liberating Patients from Mechanical Ventilation in the ICU.Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems. CHI Conference · 2024Article
- Review
- Endotracheal tube size selection in critically ill patients: a 4-year single-center experience in Saudi Arabia.Annals of Saudi medicineArticle
- Predicting Do-Not-Resuscitate Decisions in Critically Ill Patients Through Using Multitask Learning: A Retrospective Study of the MIMIC-IV Database.Inquiry : a journal of medical care organization, provision and financingArticle
- Management of invasive candidiasis in the ICU: Challenges and advances (Review).Medicine internationalReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundHas either the underlying risk or the mortality incidence among ICU patients receiving mechanical ventilation (MV) in the literature changed in recent decades? Interpreting ICU mortality trends requires an adjusted analysis accounting for changes in underlying patient risk.
methodsControl and intervention groups from 147 randomized concurrent control trials (RCCT) of various VAP prevention interventions, as listed primarily within 13 Cochrane reviews and 63 observational studies listed primarily within four systematic reviews. Eligible studies were those including ICU patients with > 50% of patients receiving > 24 h of MV with mortality data available. ICU mortality (censored day 21 or before) or late (after day 21) mortality together with group-mean age, and group-mean APACHE II scores were extracted from all groups. These incidences were summarized in five meta-regression models versus publication year being variously adjusted for age, APACHE II scores, type of study intervention and other group level parameters.
resultsAmong 210 studies published between 1985 and 2021, 169 being found in systematic reviews, the increase per decade in mean mortality incidence, group-mean APACHE II scores, and group-mean age, were < 1 percentage point (p = 0.43), 1.83 (95% CI; 0.51-3.15) points, and 3.9 (95% CI; 1.1-6.7) years, respectively. Only in the model with risk adjustment for both group-mean age and group-mean APACHE II score was a significant decline in mortality apparent. In all models, the mortality incidence among concurrent control groups of decontamination studies was paradoxically five percentage points higher than benchmark and showed greater dispersion.
conclusionMortality incidence has changed little over 35 years among ICU infection prevention studies whilst the patient age and underlying disease severity, measured as APACHE II, have both increased. The paradoxically high mortality among concurrent control groups within studies of decontamination methods of infection prevention remains unaccounted for.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.