Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37432527›Full record

ArticleMedical & biological engineering & computing2023

A transfer learning approach on MRI-based radiomics signature for overall survival prediction of low-grade and high-grade gliomas.

Viet Huan Le, Tran Nguyen Tuan Minh, Quang Hien Kha, Nguyen Quoc Khanh Le

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Medical & biological engineering & computing, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Insights into pet-based radiogenomics in oncology: an updated systematic review.European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Viet Huan Le *International Ph.D. Program in Medicine, College of Medicine, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, 110, Taiwan.
Tran Nguyen Tuan Minh *International Ph.D. Program in Medicine, College of Medicine, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, 110, Taiwan.
Quang Hien KhaInternational Ph.D. Program in Medicine, College of Medicine, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, 110, Taiwan.
Nguyen Quoc Khanh LeProfessional Master Program in Artificial Intelligence in Medicine, College of Medicine, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, 110, Taiwan. khanhlee@tmu.edu.tw.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4896-7926

Funding

National Science and Technology Council MOST110-2221-E-038-001-MY2National Science and Technology Council MOST111-2628-E-038-002-MY3
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Lower-grade gliomas (LGG) can eventually progress to glioblastoma (GBM) and death. In the context of the transfer learning approach, we aimed to train and test an MRI-based radiomics model for predicting survival in GBM patients and validate it in LGG patients. From each patient's 704 MRI-based radiomics features, we chose seventeen optimal radiomics signatures in the GBM training set (n = 71) and used these features in both the GBM testing set (n = 31) and LGG validation set (n = 107) for further analysis. Each patient's risk score, calculated based on those optimal radiomics signatures, was chosen to represent the radiomics model. We compared the radiomics model with clinical, gene status models, and combined model integrating radiomics, clinical, and gene status in predicting survival. The average iAUCs of combined models in training, testing, and validation sets were respectively 0.804, 0.878, and 0.802, and those of radiomics models were 0.798, 0.867, and 0.717. The average iAUCs of gene status and clinical models ranged from 0.522 to 0.735 in all three sets. The radiomics model trained in GBM patients can effectively predict the overall survival of GBM and LGG patients, and the combined model improved this ability.

Indexed as

Brain NeoplasmsGlioblastomaGliomaHumansMachine LearningMagnetic Resonance ImagingRetrospective StudiesGlioblastomaLower-grade gliomasNomogramPrediction modelRadiomics signatureSurvival analysis

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.