ArticleSurgical endoscopy2023
Comparative analysis of 5-year efficacy and outcomes of single anastomosis procedures as revisional surgery for weight regain following sleeve gastrectomy.
Article in Surgical endoscopy, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 27 citations in OpenAlex.
- The Nutritional Challenges Following Revisional Bariatric Surgery After Sleeve Gastrectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta Analysis.Obesity surgery · 2025Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Laparoscopic Single Anastomosis Duodeno-Ileal Bypass Versus One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass as Revisional Procedures after Sleeve Gastrectomy: Meta-analysis and Systematic Review.Obesity surgery · 2024Pooled it
- Long-term results of Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) versus single anastomosis duodeno-ileal bypass (SADI) as revisional procedures after failed sleeve gastrectomy: a systematic literature review and pooled analysis.Langenbeck's archives of surgery · 2024Pooled it
- Seven-Year Comparative Outcomes of One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass and Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass for Weight Recurrence Regain Post Sleeve Gastrectomy.Obesity surgery · 2026Article
- Comparing safety and efficacy of primary single anastomosis duodeno-ileal bypass vs. one anastomosis gastric bypass: 6 months analysis of MBSAQIP database.Obesity surgery · 2026Article
- Ten-year comparative outcomes of one-anastomosis gastric bypass versus single-anastomosis duodeno-ileal bypass as revisional procedures after sleeve gastrectomy.International journal of obesity (2005) · 2026Article
- Long-Term Outcomes of Revisional Bariatric Surgery after Sleeve Gastrectomy: Comparing Re-sleeve, Gastric Bypass, and Duodenal Switch-type Procedures.Obesity surgery · 2026Article
- Optimizing Safety and Outcomes in Metabolic/Bariatric Surgery: A Conceptual Framework for Staged Minimally Invasive Treatment.Obesity surgery · 2026Review
- Bariatric Conversion Surgery Impact on LDL Cholesterol in Patients Previously Treated with Sleeve Gastrectomy.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Nutritional Concerns in the Meta-Analysis Comparing SADI and OAGB as Revisional Procedures Following Sleeve Gastrectomy.Obesity surgery · 2025Article
- Hypoabsorption in Bariatric Surgery: Is the Benefit Worth the Risk?Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2025Review
- Novel Surgical Interventions for the Treatment of Obesity.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Review
- Comments on the Article "One Stage vs. Two-Step One Anastomosis Duodenal Switch (OADS/ SADI- S): a Safety and Efficacy Single-Center Propensity-Score Matched Analysis".Obesity surgery · 2024Article
- One-Anastomosis Gastric Bypass (OABG) vs. Single Anastomosis Duodeno-Ileal Bypass (SADI) as revisional procedure following Sleeve Gastrectomy: results of a multicenter study.Langenbeck's archives of surgery · 2024Article
- Semaglutide and Tirzepatide for the Management of Weight Recurrence After Sleeve Gastrectomy: A Retrospective Cohort Study.Obesity surgery · 2024Article
- Evaluation study of single-anastomosis duodenal-ileal bypass with sleeve gastrectomy in the treatment of Chinese obese patients based on efficacy and nutrition.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Single Anastomosis Duodeno-Ileal Bypass (SADI) as a Second Step After Failed Sleeve Gastrectomy: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.Journal of metabolic and bariatric surgery · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIt is imperative to assess the results of revisional procedures following Sleeve Gastrectomy (SG), given the substantially growing population of patients who experience weight regain within a few years after undergoing this procedure.
objectiveExamine the comparative effectiveness of the Single Anastomosis Duodeno-Ileal Bypass (SADI-S) and the One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass (OAGB-MGB) as revisional procedures, with respect to their impact on weight loss, resolution of comorbidities, incidence of complications, and rates of reoperation in patients who had weight regain after SG with up to or more than 5 years of follow-up.
settingHamad General Hospital, Academic tertiary referral center, Qatar.
methodsThis study retrospectively analyzed a database of patients who underwent the Single Anastomosis Duodeno-Ileal Switch (SADI-S) or the One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass - Mini Gastric Bypass- (OAGB-MGB) as revisional procedures for weight recidivism after a primary Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy (LSG). The follow-up period was at least 5 years, during which the impact of both procedures on weight loss, comorbidities, nutritional deficiencies, complications, and outcomes were compared.
resultsThe study comprised 91 patients, with 42 and 49 in the SADI-S and OAGB-MGB groups, respectively. Significant weight loss (measured by total weight loss percentage, TWL%) was observed at the 5-year follow-up for the SADI-S group compared to the OAGB-MGB group (30.0 ± 18.4 vs. 19.4 ± 16.3, p = 0.008). Remission of comorbidities, specifically diabetes mellitus and hypertension, was more prevalent in the SADI-S group. Notably, the OAGB-MGB group had a higher incidence of complications (28.6% vs. 21.42%) and reoperations (5 patients vs. 1 in the SADI-S group). No mortality events were reported in either group.
conclusionWhile both the OAGB-MGB and SADI-S have demonstrated efficacy as revisional procedures for weight regain following SG, the SADI-S exhibits superior outcomes compared to the OAGB-MGB with regard to weight loss, resolution of comorbidities, complication rates, and reoperation rates.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.