Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37432482›Full record

ReviewSchmerz (Berlin, Germany)2023

[Nociplastic pain in research and practice : Overview of biopsychosocial principles, possibilities and difficulties].

Hannah Schmidt, Vivian Blechschmidt

Abstract readEnglish AbstractReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Schmerz (Berlin, Germany), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. [Tumor-associated pain].Schmerz (Berlin, Germany) · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Hannah SchmidtAbteilung für Neurophysiologie, Mannheimer Zentrum für Translationale Neurowissenschaft, Universität Heidelberg, Ludolf-Krehl-Str. 13-17, 68167, Mannheim, Deutschland.
Vivian BlechschmidtAbteilung für Neurophysiologie, Mannheimer Zentrum für Translationale Neurowissenschaft, Universität Heidelberg, Ludolf-Krehl-Str. 13-17, 68167, Mannheim, Deutschland. vivian.blechschmidt@medma.uni-heidelberg.de.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Traditionally, two mechanistic pain categories were distinguished: nociceptive and neuropathic pain. After the definitions of these two mechanistic descriptors were refined more precisely in the International Association for the Study of Pain (IASP) taxonomy in 2011, a large group of patients remained whose pain could not be assigned to either of the two categories. Nociplastic pain was therefore proposed as a third mechanistic descriptor in 2016. This review article presents the current state of the integration of nociplastic pain into research and clinical practice. In particular, the possibilities and difficulties of applying this concept are addressed from a human and animal experimental research perspective.

Indexed as

NeuralgiaAnimalsHumansPain MeasurementCentral nervous system sensitizationChronic painNeuronal plasticityPain/multimodal treatmentPain/terminology

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.