Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37432477›Full record

ReviewChirurgie (Heidelberg, Germany)2023

[Surgical treatment for recurrent intra-abdominal mucinous neoplasms].

H Leebmann, S Blaj, P Piso

Abstract readEnglish AbstractReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Chirurgie (Heidelberg, Germany), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 40% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

H LeebmannKrankenhaus Barmherzige Brüder Regensburg, Prüfeninger Str. 86, 93049, Regensburg, Deutschland. hubert.leebmann@barmherzige-regensburg.de.
S BlajKrankenhaus Barmherzige Brüder Regensburg, Prüfeninger Str. 86, 93049, Regensburg, Deutschland.
P PisoKrankenhaus Barmherzige Brüder Regensburg, Prüfeninger Str. 86, 93049, Regensburg, Deutschland.
Krankenhaus Barmherzige Brüder · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe gold standard in the treatment of mucinous intra-abdominal neoplasms is cytoreductive surgery (CRS) combined with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC). Despite complete cytoreduction up to 45% of patients develop recurrences.

methodA search and analysis of the current literature were carried out.

resultsThere is still controversy regarding the best treatment strategy for patients with recurrent pseudomyxoma peritonei (PMP) after CRS and HIPEC. The clinical management of these patients depends on many factors, such as the site and volume of recurrence, histological subtype and symptoms. Treatment options range from repeated surgery with curative intent with or without HIPEC to watch and wait strategies. In selected patients redo surgery is feasible and safe with low morbidity and mortality. Iterative complete CRS can result in a median 5‑year overall survival of more than 80%. Debulking surgery leads to a prolonged survival and to symptom control fora period with of nearly 2 years.

conclusionRepeated complete cytoreduction of recurrent PMP can result in long-term survival. Tumor debulking surgery may be particularly beneficial for symptomatic patients.

Indexed as

Appendiceal NeoplasmsHyperthermia, InducedNeoplasms, Cystic, Mucinous, and SerousPeritoneal NeoplasmsPseudomyxoma PeritoneiHumansCytoreductive surgeryDebulkingHyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapyPseudomyxoma peritoneiRecurrence

Identifiers

PMID37432477
OpenAlexW4383872811

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.