Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37432396›Full record

ArticleChild's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery2023

Externalization of an infected vagus nerve stimulator generator without a break in anti-seizure therapy: a technical note.

Cemal Karakas, Prachi Raichur, Ian Mutchnick

Abstract readCase Reports
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Child's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 88% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Cemal KarakasDivision of Pediatric Neurology, Department of Neurology, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY, 40202, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9516-2285
Prachi RaichurDivision of Pediatric Neurology, Department of Neurology, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY, 40202, USA.
Ian MutchnickNorton Children's Neuroscience Institute and Children's Hospital, 210 East Gray St, Suite 1105, Louisville, KY, 40202, USA. ian.mutchnick@nortonhealthcare.org.ORCID 0000-0001-6207-4230
University of Louisville · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionVagus nerve stimulation (VNS) is a widely used treatment for drug-resistant epilepsy. An infection of the VNS generator pocket occurs in 3-8% of cases. Current standard of care requires the removal of the device, antibiotic therapy, and then replacement of the device. The consequential break in VNS therapy leaves patients highly susceptible to seizures.

methodsRetrospective case report.

resultsThe externalized generator continued to provide electroceutical coverage of the patient's seizures while the pocket was sterilized with IV antibiotics as well as betadine and local antibiotics. The externalized generator was kept safe against the patient's chest with ioban and an entriely new system was implanted on post-externalization day 5. The patient is now 7 months post-operative and without any evidence of infection.

conclusionsWe report successful management of an infected VNS generator with externalization and short interval replacement of the entire system without any break in anti-seizure therapy.

Indexed as

Drug Resistant EpilepsyVagus Nerve StimulationAnti-Bacterial AgentsHumansRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeVagus NerveAnti-Bacterial AgentsEpilepsy surgeryExternalizationHardware infectionPocket infectionVNS

Identifiers

PMID37432396
OpenAlexW4383872090

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.