Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37432264›Full record

SynthesisThe oncologist2023

Prevalence of KRAS G12C Mutation and Co-mutations and Associated Clinical Outcomes in Patients With Colorectal Cancer: A Systematic Literature Review.

John H Strickler, Takayuki Yoshino, Kendall Stevinson, Christian Stefan Eichinger, Christina Giannopoulou, Marko Rehn, Dominik Paul Modest

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The oncologist, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Association between KRAS gene mutation and clinicopathological factors in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer.Arquivos brasileiros de cirurgia digestiva : ABCD = Brazilian archives of digestive surgery · 2026
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Cancers · 2025
    Article
  12. Efficacy and safety of IBI351 (fulzerasib) monotherapy in KRASSignal transduction and targeted therapy · 2025
    Article
  13. RETRACTED: The Impact ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Review
  14. Review
  15. Early-Onset Colorectal Cancer: From Genetic Discovery to Clinical Innovation.American Society of Clinical Oncology educational book. American Society of Clinical Oncology. Annual Meeting · 2025
    Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

John H StricklerDepartment of Medicine, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA.
Takayuki YoshinoDepartment of Gastroenterology and Gastrointestinal Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Kashiwa, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-0489-4756
Kendall StevinsonHealth Economics and Outcomes Researc, Amgen Inc., Thousand Oaks, CA, USA.
Christian Stefan EichingerValue Demonstration Practice, Oxford Pharmagenesis, Oxford, UK.
Christina GiannopoulouHealth Economics and Outcomes Research, Amgen (Europe) GmbH, Rotkreuz, Switzerland.
Marko RehnGlobal Medical Affairs, Amgen Inc., Thousand Oaks, CA, USA.
Dominik Paul ModestDepartment for Hematology, Oncology and Cancer Immunology (CVK), Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-6853-0599

Funding

Amgen Inc
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeA systematic literature review was conducted to estimate the global prevalence of Kirsten rat sarcoma virus gene (KRAS) mutations, with an emphasis on the clinically significant KRAS G12C mutation, and to estimate the prognostic significance of these mutations in patients with colorectal cancer (CRC).

designRelevant English-language publications in the Embase, MEDLINE, and the Cochrane Library databases (from 2009 to 2021) and congress presentations (from 2016 to 2021) were reviewed. Eligible studies were those that reported the prevalence and clinical outcomes of the KRAS G12C mutation in patients with CRC.

resultsA total of 137 studies (interventional [n = 8], post hoc analyses of randomized clinical trials [n = 6], observational [n = 122], and longitudinal [n =1]) were reviewed. Sixty-eight studies reported the prevalence of KRAS mutations (KRASm) in 42 810 patients with CRC. The median global prevalence of KRASm was 38% (range, 13.3%-58.9%) and that of the KRAS G12C mutation (KRAS G12C) 3.1% (range, 0.7%-14%). Available evidence suggests that KRASm are possibly more common in tumors that develop on the right side of the colon. Limited evidence suggests a lower objective response rate and inferior disease-free/relapse-free survival in patients with KRAS G12C compared with patients with KRASwt or other KRASm.

conclusionOur analysis reveals that KRAS G12C is prevalent in 3% of patients with CRC. Available evidence suggests a poor prognosis for patients with KRAS G12C. Right-sided tumors were more likely to harbor KRASm; however, their role in determining clinical outcomes needs to be investigated further.

Indexed as

Colorectal NeoplasmsLung NeoplasmsHumansMutationNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalPrevalenceProto-Oncogene Proteins p21(ras)KRAS protein, humanProto-Oncogene Proteins p21(ras)colorectal cancerglobalKRAS G12CKRASmprevalenceprognosissystematic literature review

Identifiers

PMID37432264
PMCPMC10628573

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.