Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37432196›Full record

ArticleNutrients2023

Transplacental Transport of Artificial Sweeteners.

Magnus Leth-Møller, Christina Søndergaard Duvald, Sofie Stampe, Eva Greibe, Elke Hoffmann-Lücke, Michael Pedersen, Per Glud Ovesen

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nutrients, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Re-evaluation of acesulfame K (E 950) as food additive.EFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority · 2025
    Article
  7. Nutrition, Pregnancy, and Preexisting Diabetes: Exploring What Has Changed and What Remains the Same.Diabetes spectrum : a publication of the American Diabetes Association · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Magnus Leth-MøllerDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Aarhus University Hospital, Palle Juul-Jensens Boulevard 99, 8200 Aarhus Nord, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0003-2552-6247
Christina Søndergaard DuvaldComparative Medicine Lab, Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Palle Juul-Jensens Boulevard 11, 8200 Aarhus Nord, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0001-8657-1231
Sofie StampeDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Aarhus University Hospital, Palle Juul-Jensens Boulevard 99, 8200 Aarhus Nord, Denmark.
Eva GreibeDepartment of Clinical Medicine, Health, Aarhus University, Palle Juul-Jensens Boulevard 99, 8200 Aarhus Nord, Denmark.
Elke Hoffmann-LückeDepartment of Clinical Medicine, Health, Aarhus University, Palle Juul-Jensens Boulevard 99, 8200 Aarhus Nord, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-2437-0140
Michael PedersenComparative Medicine Lab, Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Palle Juul-Jensens Boulevard 11, 8200 Aarhus Nord, Denmark.
Per Glud OvesenDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Aarhus University Hospital, Palle Juul-Jensens Boulevard 99, 8200 Aarhus Nord, Denmark.
Aarhus University · DKSteno Diabetes Centers · DK

Funding

A.P. Møller og Hustru Chastine Mc-Kinney Møllers Fond 19-L-0265Helga and Peter Korning Foundation DC472123-004-67P. Carl Petersen Foundation NA
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The prevalence of obesity is increasing, and the origins of obesity and metabolic dysfunction may be traced back to fetal life. Currently, overweight pregnant women are advised to substitute sugar-sweetened beverages with diet drinks containing artificial sweeteners. Recent evidence suggests that the consumption of artificial sweeteners during pregnancy increases the risk of obesity in the child, but the mechanism is unknown. We hypothesized the transportation of artificial sweeteners across the placenta into the fetal circulation and the amniotic fluid. We included 19 pregnant women who were given an oral dose of acesulfame, cyclamate, saccharin, and sucralose immediately before a planned caesarean section. Nine women were included as controls, and they refrained from an intake of artificial sweeteners. The maternal and fetal blood and amniotic fluid were collected during the caesarean section, and concentrations of artificial sweeteners were measured using mass spectrometry. We found a linear relationship between the fetal plasma concentrations of artificial sweeteners and the maternal plasma concentrations, with adjusted coefficients of 0.49 (95% CI: 0.28-0.70) for acesulfame, 0.72 (95% CI: 0.48-0.95) for cyclamate, 0.51 (95% CI: 0.38-0.67) for saccharin, and 0.44 (95% CI: 0.33-0.55) for sucralose. We found no linear relationship between amniotic fluid and fetal plasma concentrations, but there were positive ratios for all four sweeteners. In conclusion, the four sweeteners investigated all crossed the placenta and were present in the fetal circulation and amniotic fluid.

Indexed as

SaccharinSweetening AgentsAmniotic FluidCesarean SectionChildCyclamatesFemaleHumansObesityPregnancyThiazinesacetosulfameCyclamatesSaccharinSweetening AgentsThiazinesartificial sweetenerschildhood overweightfetal programmingoverweightpregnancy

Identifiers

PMID37432196
PMCPMC10181363
OpenAlexW4366987290

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.