Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37432157›Full record

SynthesisNutrients2023

The Impact of Whey Protein Supplementation on Sarcopenia Progression among the Elderly: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Magdalena Sylwia Kamińska, Kamila Rachubińska, Szymon Grochans, Karolina Skonieczna-Żydecka, Anna Maria Cybulska, Elżbieta Grochans, Beata Karakiewicz

Open access · goldAbstract readSystematic ReviewMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Nutrients, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 8 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 8 pooled it
4.4field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 8 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Magdalena Sylwia KamińskaSubdepartment of Long-Term Care and Palliative Medicine, Department of Social Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, Pomeranian Medical University in Szczecin, 48 Żołnierska, 71-210 Szczecin, Poland.ORCID 0000-0003-4795-033X
Kamila RachubińskaDepartment of Nursing, Faculty of Health Sciences, Pomeranian Medical University in Szczecin, 48 Żołnierska, 71-210 Szczecin, Poland.
Szymon GrochansDepartment of Clinical Nursing, Faculty of Health Sciences, Pomeranian Medical University in Szczecin, 48 Żołnierska, 71-210 Szczecin, Poland.
Karolina Skonieczna-ŻydeckaDepartment of Biochemical Science, Faculty of Health Sciences, Pomeranian Medical University in Szczecin, 24 Broniewskiego, 71-460 Szczecin, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-3430-9079
Anna Maria CybulskaDepartment of Nursing, Faculty of Health Sciences, Pomeranian Medical University in Szczecin, 48 Żołnierska, 71-210 Szczecin, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-6912-287X
Elżbieta GrochansDepartment of Nursing, Faculty of Health Sciences, Pomeranian Medical University in Szczecin, 48 Żołnierska, 71-210 Szczecin, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-3679-7002
Beata KarakiewiczSubdepartment of Social Medicine and Public Health, Department of Social Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, Pomeranian Medical University in Szczecin, 48 Żołnierska, 71-210 Szczecin, Poland.ORCID 0000-0001-6527-7287
Pomeranian Medical University · PL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We conducted a systematic literature review and meta-analysis to investigate the role of whey protein supplementation in the functioning of the elderly with sarcopenia. The aim was to investigate the available scientific evidence and determine the best recommendations with respect to whey protein supplementation in sarcopenic patients. Methods: Databases, including CINAHL, Embase PubMed, and Web of Science, were searched from database inception until 31 December 2022 for randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing the efficacy of whey protein supplementation in the elderly with sarcopenia. Data on study design, risk of bias, patient, illness, and treatment characteristics from each study were independently extracted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA). The tool "assessing risk of bias" from the Cochrane Handbook was used to evaluate the quality of the included papers. Results: The search identified 629 records; 590 articles were excluded as duplicates or after evaluation at the title or abstract level. Out of 39 full-text articles that were reviewed, 29 were excluded for not fulfilling the inclusion criteria. There is some evidence that whey protein supplementation combined with age-appropriate physical exercise might improve muscle mass and lower limb function in the elderly with sarcopenia. The present meta-analysis demonstrated overall that whey supplementation does not improve any of the tested sarcopenia-linked parameters. However, we found that study duration (weeks) and age significantly affect the handgrip strength rate and the chair and stand test rate, respectively, so consideration should be given to oral supplementation combined with the age of participants and an appropriate physical activity as a form of sarcopenia prevention in the high-risk group.

Indexed as

SarcopeniaWheyAgedDatabases, FactualDietary SupplementsHumansWhey ProteinsWhey Proteinsolder adultssarcopeniawhey protein

Identifiers

PMID37432157
PMCPMC10180973
OpenAlexW4366827390

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.