Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37431834›Full record

ReviewGlobal health action2023

Perspectives of health workers engaging in task shifting to deliver health care in low-and-middle-income countries: a qualitative evidence synthesis.

Karen Coales, Hannah Jennings, Saima Afaq, Aatik Arsh, Mujeeb Bhatti, Faraz Siddiqui, Najma Siddiqi

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Global health action, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
19.2field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Changing practices due to a shortage of nurses: A qualitative exploratory study.International journal of nursing studies advances · 2025
    Article
  20. System Models for Synchronous Strategies in Operational Healthcare Forecasting.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Karen CoalesDepartment of Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-5081-1846
Hannah JenningsDepartment of Health Sciences, Hull York Medical School, University of York, York, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-8580-0327
Saima AfaqInstitute of Public Health & Social Sciences, Khyber Medical University, Peshawar, Pakistan.ORCID 0000-0002-9080-2220
Aatik ArshInstitute of Public Health & Social Sciences, Khyber Medical University, Peshawar, Pakistan.ORCID 0000-0003-3929-6606
Mujeeb BhattiInstitute of Public Health & Social Sciences, Khyber Medical University, Peshawar, Pakistan.ORCID 0000-0003-1061-6709
Faraz SiddiquiDepartment of Health Sciences, University of York, York, Uk.ORCID 0000-0002-2253-3911
Najma SiddiqiDepartment of Health Sciences, Hull York Medical School, University of York, York, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-1794-2152
University of York · GBKhyber Medical University · PK

Funding

Department of Health NIHR200806
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLow- and middle-income countries (LMICs) are experiencing growing demand for healthcare services yet face a persistent shortage in access to specialist health workers (SHWs). Task shifting is an approach used to address this gap in service provision. Specific healthcare tasks are shifted to other, larger cadres of non-specialist health workers (NSHWs), including lay health workers with SHWs potentially taking on supervisory roles. Previous studies demonstrate that task shifting is both clinically and economically effective, however the impact of task shifting on health workers (HWs) is not fully understood.

objectiveThe aim of this synthesis is to generate new knowledge about what influences HWs perspectives of benefits and costs of engaging in task shifting.

methodsA qualitative evidence synthesis (QES) of peer-reviewed literature using databases CINAHL, the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Psych INFO, MEDLINE, EMBASE, Epistimonikos, Web of Science (science and social science citation index), Scopus LILACS, the African Index Medicus and Google Scholar. Eligible studies were those that included qualitative data about HWs perspectives of task shifting in LMICs. Information from eligible studies was extracted into a Google Sheet, and the data gathered were analysed thematically.

resultsFifty-four studies were included in the QES. Results were organised under three themes, 'the cultural environment in which task shifting is employed', 'access to resources for task shifting' and 'alignment with personal values and beliefs, self-efficacy and personal emotional resilience'.

conclusionThis is the first review bringing together views about task shifting from the perspective of different cadres of HWs drawn from diverse healthcare, geographical and country settings in LMICs. Task shifting is a complex process which relies upon the active engagement of HWs. Taking into consideration factors that influence HWs perspectives, such as their personal characteristics, preparatory training, and ongoing access to resources, is important for informing how task shifted healthcare initiatives are designed and delivered to successfully widen access to healthcare in LMICs.

Indexed as

Delivery of Health CareDeveloping CountriesHealth WorkforceTask Performance and AnalysisHumansSystematic Reviews as Topiccommunicable diseasesHealthcareHIVLMICslow-resource settingsmaternal, childmental healthnon-communicable diseasesnursereview

Identifiers

PMID37431834
PMCPMC10337489
OpenAlexW4383872117

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.