Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37431683›Full record

ArticleJournal of cachexia, sarcopenia and muscle2023

Development and applicability of modified weight loss grading system in cancer: a real-world cohort study.

Hailun Xie, Guotian Ruan, Lishuang Wei, Heyang Zhang, Yizhong Ge, Shiqi Lin, Mengmeng Song, Qi Zhang, Xi Zhang, Ziwen Wang and 9 more

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of cachexia, sarcopenia and muscle, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Diagnosis of malnutrition in cancer patients.Cancer biology & medicine · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors.

Hailun XieDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Department of Clinical Nutrition, Beijing Shijitan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Guotian RuanDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Department of Clinical Nutrition, Beijing Shijitan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Lishuang WeiDepartment of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, Beijing Institute of Respiratory Medicine and Beijing Chao-Yang Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Heyang ZhangDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Department of Clinical Nutrition, Beijing Shijitan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Yizhong GeDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Department of Clinical Nutrition, Beijing Shijitan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Shiqi LinDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Department of Clinical Nutrition, Beijing Shijitan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Mengmeng SongDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Department of Clinical Nutrition, Beijing Shijitan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Qi ZhangDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Department of Clinical Nutrition, Beijing Shijitan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Xi ZhangDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Department of Clinical Nutrition, Beijing Shijitan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Ziwen WangDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Department of Clinical Nutrition, Beijing Shijitan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Chenan LiuDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Department of Clinical Nutrition, Beijing Shijitan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Jinyu ShiDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Department of Clinical Nutrition, Beijing Shijitan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Xiaoyue LiuDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Department of Clinical Nutrition, Beijing Shijitan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Ming YangDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Department of Clinical Nutrition, Beijing Shijitan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Xin ZhengDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Department of Clinical Nutrition, Beijing Shijitan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Yue ChenDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Department of Clinical Nutrition, Beijing Shijitan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Xiaowei ZhangDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Department of Clinical Nutrition, Beijing Shijitan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Li DengDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Department of Clinical Nutrition, Beijing Shijitan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Hanping ShiDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Department of Clinical Nutrition, Beijing Shijitan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.ORCID 0000-0003-4514-8693

Funding

National Key Research and Development Program 2017YFC1309200National Key Research and Development Program 2022YFC2009600Young Elite Scientists Sponsorship Program by CAST 2022QNRC001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe original weight loss grading system (WLGS) was developed in western population, which did not perform effectively in cancer patients from China. This study aimed to develop and validate the modified WLGS (mWLGS) in the prognostic assessment of cancer patients in China.

methodsA prospective multicentre real-world cohort study involving 16 842 patients diagnosed with cancer was conducted. Cox regression was used to calculate the hazard ratios for overall survival. Logistic linear regression was used to assess the odds ratio for 90-day outcomes.

resultsWe calculated survival risks for the 25 mWLGS groups and clustered the approximate survival risks. Finally, we revised the prognostic grading system for mWLGS to include five grades of 0-4. Compared with the original WLGS, the mWLGS had a better prognostic differentiation effect in predicting the prognosis of patients with cancer. The survival rate gradually deteriorated with increasing grade of mWLGS, with the survival rate of grade 0 decreasing from 76.4% to 48.2% for grade 4 (76.4 vs. 72.8 vs. 66.1 vs. 57.0 vs. 48.2%, respectively). The mWLGS provides effective prognostic stratification for most site-specific cancers, especially lung and gastrointestinal cancers. High-grade mWLGS is independently associated with an increased risk of poor quality of life and adverse 90-day outcomes. Multivariate Cox regression analysis showed that the mWLGS was an independent prognostic factor for cancer patients in the validation cohorts.

conclusionsCompared with the original WLGS, the mWLGS can better stratify the prognosis of cancer patients. mWLGS is a useful tool for predicting survival, 90-day outcomes, and quality of life in patients with cancer. These analyses may provide new insights into the application of WLGS in cancer patients in China.

Indexed as

NeoplasmsWeight LossAdultAgedChinaCohort StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPrognosisProspective StudiesBody mass indexCancerPrognosisWeight loss

Identifiers

PMID37431683
PMCPMC10570064

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.