ArticleJCPP advances2021
Triangulating evidence on the role of perceived versus objective experiences of childhood adversity in psychopathology.
Article in JCPP advances, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Subjective and objective experiences of childhood adversity: a meta-analysis of their agreement and relationships with psychopathology.Journal of child psychology and psychiatry, and allied disciplines · 2023Pooled it
- Childhood Maltreatment and Mental Health Problems: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Quasi-Experimental Studies.The American journal of psychiatry · 2023Pooled it
- Squaring the circle: Is triangulation of child abuse reports helpful?Child abuse & neglect · 2026Article
- A Novel Diathesis-Stress Model of Comorbid Early Onset Psychiatric Disorders.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2025Article
- A framework for understanding adverse adolescent experiences.Nature human behaviour · 2025Review
- Differential gray matter correlates and machine learning prediction of abuse and internalizing psychopathology in adolescent females.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- The future of childhood maltreatment research: Diversity and equity-informed perspectives for inclusive methodology and social justice.Development and psychopathology · 2024Review
- What's Next? Advances and Challenges in Understanding How Environmental Predictability Shapes the Development of Cognitive Control.Current directions in psychological science · 2023Article
- What's the matter with ACEs? Recommendations for considering early adversity in educational contexts.Child abuse & neglect · 2023Article
- Characterizing the dimensional structure of early-life adversity in the Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development (ABCD) Study.Developmental cognitive neuroscience · 2023Article
- A genetically informed Registered Report on adverse childhood experiences and mental health.Nature human behaviour · 2023Article
- The stress-buffering role of friendships in young people with childhood threat experiences: a preliminary report.European journal of psychotraumatology · 2023Article
- Research Review: How to interpret associations between polygenic scores, environmental risks, and phenotypes.Journal of child psychology and psychiatry, and allied disciplines · 2022Review
- Borderline personality disorder: associations with psychiatric disorders, somatic illnesses, trauma, and adverse behaviors.Molecular psychiatry · 2022Article
- Quantitative and molecular genetics of child and adolescent mental health disorders: Recent advances, knowledge gaps and directions for future research.JCPP advances · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.