The need for genetically-informative designs in developmental science: Commentary on Gustavson et al. () and Myers et al. ().

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

1. Cognitive Abilities and Educational Attainment as Antecedents of Mental Disorders: A Total Population Study of Males.Psychological science · 2025
   Article
2. Polygenic risk scores and early manifestations of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder.JCPP advances · 2022
   Article
3. The ADHD deficit in school performance across sex and parental education: A prospective sibling-comparison register study of 344,152 Norwegian adolescents.JCPP advances · 2022
   Article
4. Causation and prediction in child and adolescent mental health research.JCPP advances · 2021
   Article

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

Authors and funding

1 author.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as