Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37431458›Full record

ArticleJCPP advances2022

A scoping review investigating the use of exposure for the treatment and targeted prevention of anxiety and related disorders in young people.

Alessandra K Teunisse, Lorna Pembroke, Maddison O'Gradey-Lee, Megan Sy, Ronald M Rapee, Viviana M Wuthrich, Cathy Creswell, Jennifer L Hudson

Open access · goldAbstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in JCPP advances, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Alessandra K TeunisseCentre for Emotional Health School of Psychological Sciences Macquarie University, Macquarie Park New South Wales Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8995-6249
Lorna PembrokeCentre for Emotional Health School of Psychological Sciences Macquarie University, Macquarie Park New South Wales Australia.
Maddison O'Gradey-LeeCentre for Emotional Health School of Psychological Sciences Macquarie University, Macquarie Park New South Wales Australia.
Megan SyCentre for Emotional Health School of Psychological Sciences Macquarie University, Macquarie Park New South Wales Australia.
Ronald M RapeeCentre for Emotional Health School of Psychological Sciences Macquarie University, Macquarie Park New South Wales Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1724-1076
Viviana M WuthrichCentre for Emotional Health School of Psychological Sciences Macquarie University, Macquarie Park New South Wales Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7227-229X
Cathy CreswellDepartment of Experimental Psychology and Department of Psychiatry University of Oxford Oxford UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1889-0956
Jennifer L HudsonCentre for Emotional Health School of Psychological Sciences Macquarie University, Macquarie Park New South Wales Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5778-2670
Macquarie University · AUBlack Dog Institute · AUUniversity of Oxford · GB

Funding

Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Cognitive Behavioural Therapy (CBT) is the gold standard intervention for anxiety and related mental health disorders among young people; however, the efficacy of individual elements of CBT (e.g., exposure to feared stimuli) have received little scrutiny. Aims: This scoping review, informed by three stakeholder groups and a scientific advisory group, aimed to identify the nature and extent of the available research literature on the efficacy of exposure to feared stimuli, moderators of effectiveness in young people aged 14-24 years. Method: Three international stakeholder groups composed of clinicians ( Results: From 3508 unique abstracts, 64 papers were included for the review. While there was evidence for the efficacy of exposure as a treatment for youth anxiety disorders, fundamental gaps in knowledge of exposure in this age group were identified. Most studies examined post-traumatic stress disorder, obsessive-compulsive disorder, and specific phobias with no randomised clinical trials uniquely evaluating exposure for the treatment of DSM-5 anxiety disorders. Exposure was typically delivered accompanied by other anxiety management techniques. A multitude of optimisation strategies have been tested, yet only one of these effects (timing relative to sleep) showed preliminary evidence of replication. Conclusions: A systematic and theoretically driven program of research investigating the efficacy of exposure in young people and factors that moderate its efficacy, along with methods to overcome barriers for delivery, is urgently needed.

Indexed as

anxietybehaviourinternalising disorderinterventionobsessive–compulsive disordertherapy

Identifiers

PMID37431458
PMCPMC10242975
OpenAlexW4293247826

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.