Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37431452›Full record

ArticleJCPP advances2022

A systematic review and meta-analysis investigating the impact of childhood adversities on the mental health of LGBT+ youth.

Lucy Jonas, Gonzalo Salazar de Pablo, Mamie Shum, Chiara Nosarti, Chris Abbott, Julio Vaquerizo-Serrano

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JCPP advances, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
11.2field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 56 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. The Lived Experience of Thai LGBTQInternational journal of environmental research and public health · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. The Impact of Adversity and Family Conflict on Risk for Future Substance Use Among Young Adolescents in the Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development Study (ABCD Study): A Cohort Analysis.Journal of child and adolescent psychiatric nursing : official publication of the Association of Child and Adolescent Psychiatric Nurses, Inc · 2025
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Lucy JonasInstitute of Psychiatry Psychology and Neuroscience King's College London London UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2606-737X
Gonzalo Salazar de PabloInstitute of Psychiatry Psychology and Neuroscience King's College London London UK.
Mamie ShumSouth London & Maudsley NHS Trust London UK.
Chiara NosartiInstitute of Psychiatry Psychology and Neuroscience King's College London London UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6305-9710
Chris AbbottSouth London & Maudsley NHS Trust London UK.
Julio Vaquerizo-SerranoInstitute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience King's College London West London NHS Trust London UK.
King's College London · GBSouth London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/S026460/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The presence of trauma as a backdrop to the lives of LGBT+ youth has been recognised in recent literature. LGBT+ youth report a higher frequency, severity and pervasiveness of adverse childhood experiences when compared to their heterosexual and cisgender counterparts. This exposure has been directly related to an increased risk of mental health problems. Method: A systematic literature search of Medline, Embase, PsycINFO, PubMed and Web of Science was conducted from the date of their inception until the 1st September 2021. The study protocol was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42021240472). Results: A total of 27 studies satisfied the inclusion criteria and were used in the systematic review, representing 199,285 participants, 26,505 of whom identified as LGBT+ (mean age 16.54). Female participants (ranging from 11% to 74%) and white participants (7.7%-96%) made up the largest percentage of most samples. Depressive symptoms were the most commonly described psychiatric outcome ( Conclusions: Continued advocacy is needed from communities and Allies to support and empower LGBT+ youth in the face of adversity. Longitudinal and longer-term studies are required to further understand the relationship between adverse experiences in LGBT+ youth and the impact on mental health.

Indexed as

adverse childhood experiencesLGBT+ youthmental health outcomesmeta‐analysis

Identifiers

PMID37431452
PMCPMC10242973
OpenAlexW4280598617

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.