Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37431438›Full record

ArticleJCPP advances2021

Ensemble classification of autism spectrum disorder using structural magnetic resonance imaging features.

Yanli Zhang-James, Jan K Buitelaar, ENIGMA‐ASD Working Group, Daan van Rooij, Stephen V Faraone

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JCPP advances, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Yanli Zhang-JamesDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences SUNY Upstate Medical University Syracuse New York USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2104-0963
Jan K BuitelaarRadboudumc, Radboud University Medical Center Nijmegen The Netherlands.
ENIGMA‐ASD Working Group
Daan van RooijDonders Centre for Cognitive Neuroimaging Radboud University Medical Center Nijmegen The Netherlands.
Stephen V FaraoneDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences SUNY Upstate Medical University Syracuse New York USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9217-3982
Radboud University Nijmegen · NLSUNY Upstate Medical University · US

Funding

Training U54EB020403 · NIBIB · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI THOMPSON, PAUL M · 2014 to 2018
$10.1M
Longitudinal Family/Molecular Genetic Study to Validate Research Domain CriteriaR01MH101519 · NIMH · UPSTATE MEDICAL UNIVERSITY · PI FARAONE, STEPHEN V, GLATT, STEPHEN J · 2014 to 2018
$3.5M
3/7 Psychiatric Genomics Consortium: Finding actionable variationU01MH109536 · NIMH · ICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI · PI CHARNEY, ALEXANDER W, HUCKINS, LAURA MARIANNE · 2016 to 2020
$2.7M
NIBIB NIH HHS U54 EB020403NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH101519NIMH NIH HHS U01 MH109536
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Autism spectrum disorder (ASD) is characterized by a spectrum of social and communication impairments and rigid and stereotyped behaviors that have a neurodevelopmental origin. Although many imaging studies have reported structural and functional alterations in multiple brain regions, clinically useful diagnostic imaging biomarkers for ASD remain unavailable. Methods: In this study, we applied machine learning (ML) models to regional volumetric and cortical thickness data from the largest structural magnetic resonance imaging (sMRI) dataset available from the Enhancing Neuro Imaging Genetics Through Meta-Analysis (ENIGMA) consortium (1833 subjects with ASD and 1838 without ASD; age range: 1.5-64; average age: 15.6; male/female ratio: 4.2:1). Results: The highest classification accuracy on a hold-out test set was achieved using a stacked Extra Tree Classifier. The area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC) was 0.62 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.57, 0.68) and the area under the precision-recall curve was 0.58. Learning curve analysis showed the good fit of the model and suggests that more training examples will not likely benefit model performance. Conclusions: Our results suggest that sMRI volumetric and cortical thickness data alone may not provide clinically sufficient useful diagnostic biomarkers for ASD. Developing clinically useful imaging classifiers for ASD will benefit from combining other data modalities or feature types, such as functional MRI data and raw images that can leverage other machine learning (ML) techniques such as convolutional neural networks.

Indexed as

autism spectrum disorderbiomarkersclassificationmachine learningMRI

Identifiers

PMID37431438
PMCPMC10242907
OpenAlexW3211923696

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.