ArticleJCPP advances2021
The importance of selection bias in prospective birth cohort studies.
Article in JCPP advances, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Factors Associated With Parent-Reported Caries in Preschool Children From the KUNO-Kids Health Study-Repeated Cross-Sectional Analysis.Community dentistry and oral epidemiology · 2026Article
- The contribution of common and rare genetic variation to emotional and behavioural symptoms in childhood and adolescence.Molecular psychiatry · 2026Article
- Genetically Informed Research Designs in Perinatal Pharmacoepidemiology: A Methodological Overview.Drug safety · 2026Review
- Incidence and Genetic Risk of Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis in Norway by Latitude.Arthritis & rheumatology (Hoboken, N.J.) · 2025Article
- Maternal adverse childhood experiences and preschool children's behavioral problems: exploring mediation via an adapted measure of adult attachment pattern.Frontiers in psychology · 2025Article
- Population-level administrative data: A resource to advance psychological science.Current directions in psychological science · 2024Article
- Article
- Lower autonomic arousal as a risk factor for criminal offending and unintentional injuries among female conscripts.PloS one · 2024Article
- Sociodemographic, mental health, and physical health factors associated with participation within re-contactable mental health cohorts: an investigation of the GLAD Study.BMC psychiatry · 2023Article
- Examining protective factors for substance use problems and self-harm behavior during adolescence: A longitudinal co-twin control study.Development and psychopathology · 2022Article
- Association of sweetened carbonated beverage consumption during pregnancy and ADHD symptoms in the offspring: a study from the Norwegian Mother, Father and Child Cohort Study (MoBa).European journal of nutrition · 2022Article
- Biobanking in everyday clinical practice in psychiatry-The Munich Mental Health Biobank.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Sophisticated statistical analyses of data from large-scale prospective birth cohort studies combined with thoughtful study designs have advanced understanding about the causes, consequences and developmental course of child and adolescent mental health problems. Available large-scale prospective cohort studies, such as ALSPAC, MoBA, and TEDS have many noteworthy strengths, but they all suffer from non-random non-participation and attrition over time. Recent findings have highlighted that prospective birth cohort studies need to carefully consider the importance of selection bias.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.