Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37431412›Full record

ArticleJCPP advances2022

Seven reasons why binary diagnostic categories should be replaced with empirically sounder and less stigmatizing dimensions.

Benjamin B Lahey, Henning Tiemeier, Robert F Krueger

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JCPP advances, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Clinical and Psychosocial Stress Correlates of Self-Harm in Women: A Retrospective Cohort Study in the Forensic Mental Health Setting.Stress and health : journal of the International Society for the Investigation of Stress · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. The nature of psychopathology.JCPP advances · 2022
    Article
  19. JCPP advances · 2022
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Benjamin B LaheyDepartment of Public Health Sciences (MC 2000) University of Chicago Chicago Illinois USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0385-9676
Henning TiemeierHarvard T. H. Chan School of Public Health and Erasmus University Medical Center Rotterdam Boston Massachusetts USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4395-1397
Robert F KruegerUniversity of Minnesota, Twin Cities Minneapolis Minnesota USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: An ongoing positive revolution advocates a new approach to the individual differences in human emotions, cognitions, and behavior that cause distress and impair functioning. This revolution endorses the long-proposed, but still unrealized rejection of the medical model, which attributes psychological problems to a sick brain or mind. In addition, it advocates replacing the binary diagnoses used in ICD and DSM, which assume a clear discontinuity between "normal" and "abnormal" functioning, with continuous dimensions of psychological problems. Method: Selective literature review. Results and Discussion: Seven strong reasons are provided for adopting a dimensional approach.

Indexed as

dimensional approachstigmataxonomy

Identifiers

PMID37431412
PMCPMC10242872

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.