Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37431408›Full record

ArticleJCPP advances2021

Integrated care to address child and adolescent health in the 21st century: A clinical review.

Mina Fazel, Alice Townsend, Harriet Stewart, Maryland Pao, Isabel Paz, Jane Walker, Susan M Sawyer, Michael Sharpe

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JCPP advances, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
9.3field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 50 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 5 institutions in 4 countries.

Mina FazelDepartment of Psychiatry University of Oxford Oxford UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9342-2365
Alice TownsendSunderland and South Tyneside NHS Foundation Trust Tyne and Wear UK.
Harriet StewartThe Oxford Psychological Medicine Centre Oxford University Hospitals NHSFT Oxford UK.
Maryland PaoDepartment of Health and Human Services National Institute of Mental Health National Institutes of Health Bethesda Maryland USA.
Isabel PazThe Oxford Psychological Medicine Centre Oxford University Hospitals NHSFT Oxford UK.
Jane WalkerDepartment of Psychiatry University of Oxford Oxford UK.
Susan M SawyerCentre for Adolescent Health Royal Children's Hospital Parkville Victoria Australia.
Michael SharpeDepartment of Psychiatry University of Oxford Oxford UK.
University of Oxford · GBOxford University Hospitals NHS Trust · GBNational Institutes of Health · USRoyal Children's Hospital · AUSouth Tyneside and Sunderland NHS Foundation Trust · GB

Funding

Psychiatry Consultation Liaison Service ResearchZIAMH002922 · NIMH · NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF MENTAL HEALTH · PI PAO, MARYLAND · 2009 to 2025
$11.5M
Intramural NIH HHS ZIA MH002922
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Increasing specialisation and technical sophistication of medical tools across the 21st century have contributed to dramatic improvements in the life-expectancy of children and adolescents with complex physical health problems. Concurrently, there is growing appreciation within the community of the extent that children and adolescents experience mental disorders, which are more prevalent in those with complex chronic, serious or life-limiting health conditions. In this context, there are compelling reasons for paediatric services to move to a model of care that promotes greater integration of child psychiatry within the medical, somatic teams that care for children and adolescents in children's hospitals. Aims: In this article, we discuss the range of medical disorders managed by contemporary paediatrics. Materials and Methods: We conducted a broad review of the literature and existing services, and use individual accounts to illustrate adolescents' healthcare preferences in the context of the challenges they experience around their mental health. Results: Relevant disorders include life-limiting disorders, such as cancer; disorders involving the brain, such as epilepsy; common chronic disorders, such as asthma and diabetes; psychiatric emergencies, such as deliberate self-harm; and conditions that most commonly present to paediatric services, but where psychiatric input is required, such as severe eating disorders, somatic symptom disorders and gender dysphoria. The persisting legacy of the historical separation of physical and mental health services is described. Yet there are many models of service integration that can promote more collaborative care between psychiatrists and medical specialists, including some which have been taken to scale. Discussion: In essence, clinical teams in children's hospitals require more collaborative approaches that facilitate early recognition and treatment of the psychological aspects of illness as an integral part of patient-centred, family-focussed paediatric care, rather than as something that is bolted on when things go wrong. Conclusion: Whilst trust and goodwill between services and providers will be required for novel models of care to be implemented, evaluation of these new models and incorporation of young people's healthcare preferences is needed.

Indexed as

adolescentchildcollaborative caredisabilitieshealthcareintegrationmental healthquality

Identifiers

PMID37431408
PMCPMC10242873
OpenAlexW3198334317

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.