Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37431381›Full record

ArticleKorean journal of neurotrauma2023

Electron Microscopic Study in the Rat Model of Electrically Injured Myelopathy: Preliminary Report.

Je Hoon Jeong, Cheong Hoon Seo, Dae Hoon Lee

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Korean journal of neurotrauma, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Je Hoon JeongDepartment of Neurosurgery, Soonchunhyang University Bucheon Hospital, Bucheon, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4656-0113
Cheong Hoon SeoDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, Hangang Sacred Heart Hospital, College of Medicine, Hallym University, Seoul, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4091-6382
Dae Hoon LeeKorea Institute of Machinery and Materials, Daejeon, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5627-2054

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: The patient with electrically injured myelopathy showed mild motor weakness without somatosensory pathway abnormalities. Few reports have been reported on the pathophysiological mechanisms of electrically injured myelopathy, and there is controversy about the exact pathological causes. This study aimed to investigate the ultrastructural changes in the electron microscopic findings of electrical spinal cord injury. Methods: Nine rats were used in this study. We performed 7 electrical shocks (frequency, 120 Hz; pulse width, 0.9 ms; duration, 3 seconds; current, 99 mA) using an electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) apparatus (57800 ECT unit; UGO BASILE). We used one ear and one contralateral hind limb as entry and exit sites, respectively. We only enrolled rats with hind limb weakness and performed electron microscopy evaluations of the spinal cord on the first day and 4 weeks after injury. Results: On the first day after injury, an electron microscopic examination showed a directly damaged area that appeared to be torn as physical damage, damaged myelin sheath, vacuolated axons in the myelin sheath, swollen Golgi apparatus, and injured mitochondria. Looking at changes in motor and sensory nerves, the sensory neurons showed recovered mitochondria and Golgi apparatus 4 weeks after injury; however, motor neurons still showed injured mitochondria, swollen Golgi apparatus, and endoplasmic reticulum. Conclusion: This study showed that recovery from ultrastructural injury was more rapid in sensory neurons than in motor neurons.

Indexed as

Animals, laboratoryBurns, electricElectron microscopySpinal cord injuries

Identifiers

PMID37431381
PMCPMC10329894

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.