ReviewKorean journal of neurotrauma2023
Intracranial Pressure Monitoring for Acute Brain Injured Patients: When, How, What Should We Monitor.
Review in Korean journal of neurotrauma, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.
- Prognostic value of early intracranial pressure curve following surgical decompression: A machine learning analysis.Brain & spine · 2026Article
- Intracranial pressure, neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio, platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio, C-reactive protein, and D-dimer mortality predictors in isolated severe traumatic brain injury.Surgical neurology international · 2026Article
- Article
- The Collapse of Brain Clearance: Glymphatic-Venous Failure, Aquaporin-4 Breakdown, and AI-Empowered Precision Neurotherapeutics in Intracranial Hypertension.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Optic Nerve Sheath Diameter Estimation to Detect Increased Intracranial Pressure in Traumatic Brain Injury patients at a Level I Trauma Center in Eastern India.Korean journal of neurotrauma · 2025Article
- Developing practical machine learning survival models to identify high-risk patients for in-hospital mortality following traumatic brain injury.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Article
- Parametric analysis of craniocerebral injury mechanism in pedestrian traffic accidents based on finite element methods.Chinese journal of traumatology = Zhonghua chuang shang za zhi · 2024Article
- "NeuroVanguard": a contemporary strategy in neuromonitoring for severe adult brain injury patients.Critical care (London, England) · 2024Review
- Rheoencephalography: A non-invasive method for neuromonitoring.Journal of electrical bioimpedance · 2024Article
- Neurosurgical intervention in ultra-severe closed traumatic brain injury: Is it worth the effort?Brain & spine · 2024Review
- Neurological manifestations of encephalitic alphaviruses, traumatic brain injuries, and organophosphorus nerve agent exposure.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
While there is no level I recommendation for intracranial pressure (ICP) monitoring, it is typically indicated for patients with severe traumatic brain injury (TBI) with a Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score of 3-8 (class II). Even for moderate TBI patients with GCS 9-12, ICP monitoring should be considered for risk of increased ICP. The impact of ICP monitoring on patient outcomes is still not well-established, but recent studies reported a reduction of early mortality (class III) in TBI patients. There is no standard protocol for the application of ICP monitoring. In cases where cerebrospinal fluid drainage is required, an external ventricular drain is commonly used. In other cases, parenchymal ICP monitoring devices are generally employed. Subdural or non-invasive forms are not suitable for ICP monitoring. The mean value of ICP is the parameter recommended for observation in many guidelines. In TBI, values above 22 mmHg are associated with increased mortality. However, recent studies proposed various parameters including cumulative time with ICP above 20 mmHg (pressure-time dose), pressure reactivity index, ICP waveform characteristics (pulse amplitude of ICP, mean ICP wave amplitude), and the compensatory reserve of the brain (reserve-amplitude-pressure), which are useful in predicting patient outcomes and guiding treatment. Further research is required for validation of these parameters compared to simple ICP monitoring.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.