ArticleCureus2023
Red Cell Distribution Width in Chronic Liver Disease: An Observational Study.
Article in Cureus, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Red Cell Distribution Width as an Independent Prognostic Biomarker in MASLD.Antioxidants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Sex differences in the association between red cell distribution width and 30-day mortality in critically ill patients with acute cholangitis: a retrospective cohort study.BMC gastroenterology · 2025Article
- Novel insights into estimating the postmortem interval: red cell distribution width - standard deviation.Forensic science, medicine, and pathology · 2025Article
- Association of clinical laboratory parameters with latent tuberculosis infection among healthcare workers of primary health centers-A cross-sectional observational study.PLOS global public health · 2025Article
- Red Cell Distribution Width as a Predictor of Survival in Patients with Hepatocellular Carcinoma.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundChronic liver diseases (CLDs) encompass a group of conditions that are marked by diminished liver function due to ongoing inflammation or damage. This study aimed to establish a relationship between the red cell distribution width (RDW) and two scoring systems, namely the Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) score and Child-Turcotte-Pugh (CTP) score, in individuals diagnosed with CLDs.
methodsThe study was carried out at Aarupadai Veedu Medical College & Hospital, Pondicherry, India, following approval from the Institutional Ethical Committee in the Department of General Medicine and Gastroenterology. It involved 50 patients aged 18 years and above who were diagnosed with CLD. The RDW of all selected patients was measured using a three-part autoanalyzer, and its correlation with the MELD and CTP scores was examined. Data analysis was performed using IBM SPSS (Statistical Package for Social Sciences), version 21.0 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY), with a significance level set at p < 0.05.
resultsWhen comparing the baseline characteristics including age, gender, and encephalopathy, no statistically significant differences were found between RDW-standard deviation (RDW-SD) and RDW-corpuscular value (RDW-CV) (p > 0.05). However, a statistically significant correlation was observed between the presence of ascites and RDW-CV values (p = 0.029). Furthermore, there was a significant association between the CTP score and RDW-SD (p < 0.0001). The association between the MELD score and RDW-SD was also found to be statistically significant (p = 0.006). Similarly, statistically significant results were obtained between the MELD score and RDW-CV (p = 0.034).
conclusionThe utilization of RDW holds promise as a convenient and effective tool for evaluating the severity of individuals with CLD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.